# Arbor Threat Mitigation System vs Imperva DDoS Protection Comparison --- ## AI Generated Summary - **G2 reviewers report** that Arbor Threat Mitigation System excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Imperva DDoS Protection. Users appreciate its effectiveness in protecting against DDoS attacks, particularly in telecom environments, highlighting its reliability and ease of use. - **Users say** that Arbor's flexibility in choosing different models, like the TMS8100 and HD1000, allows for tailored solutions that fit specific needs, making it a versatile choice. In contrast, some Imperva users find its configuration options for individual websites beneficial, but they may not offer the same level of customization. - **Reviewers mention** that Arbor Threat Mitigation System has a strong reputation in the market, with users noting that it seldom requires support, which speaks to its user-friendly design. On the other hand, while Imperva's GUI is described as easy to use, some users may still face challenges in fully leveraging its features. - **According to verified reviews** , Arbor's quality of support is rated lower than Imperva's, indicating that while Arbor is effective, users may occasionally seek more responsive assistance. Imperva users, however, appreciate the support they receive, which enhances their overall experience. - **G2 reviewers highlight** that Arbor's infrastructure protection capabilities are well-regarded, with users noting its effectiveness in filtering out unwanted traffic. In comparison, Imperva's input sanitization mechanism is praised for its ability to automatically filter harmful code, showcasing its strengths in web application security. - **Users report** that while Arbor has a solid performance in enterprise settings, Imperva is favored by mid-market companies for its ease of setup and administration. This suggests that Imperva may be a more accessible option for smaller organizations looking for DDoS protection without extensive resources. | | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.6 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 47 | 12 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (59.1% of reviews) | Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Top Pros & Cons ### Arbor Threat Mitigation System Pros: - Alerts (1 reviews) - Security (1 reviews) Cons: - Pricing Issues (1 reviews) ### Imperva DDoS Protection **Not enough data** --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 8.6 (17 reviews) | 9.1 (9 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.7 (33 reviews) | 8.9 (9 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | 8.1 (26 reviews) | 9.3 (9 reviews) | | **Ease of Admin** | 8.7 (10 reviews) | 9.3 (9 reviews) | | **Quality of Support** | 7.9 (17 reviews) | 8.9 (9 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.2 (10 reviews) | 8.7 (9 reviews) | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.2 (13 reviews) | 8.7 (9 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### Arbor Threat Mitigation System #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Imperva DDoS Protection #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial Yes --- ## Features Comparison By Category ### DDoS Protection | Product | Score | Reviews | |---|---|---| | **Arbor Threat Mitigation System** | 8.3/10 | 10 | | **Imperva DDoS Protection** | 9.3/10 | 8 | #### Management | Feature | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **IT Alerting** | Feature Not Available | 9.0 (8 reviews) | | **Network Capacity** | Feature Not Available | 9.8 (8 reviews) | | **Logging** | Feature Not Available | 8.5 (8 reviews) | | **API / Integrations** | 7.7 (10 reviews) | 8.6 (7 reviews) | #### Protection | Feature | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **DNS Protection** | 8.5 (9 reviews) | 9.2 (8 reviews) | | **Website Protection** | 8.2 (10 reviews) | 9.6 (8 reviews) | | **Infrastructure Protection** | 8.8 (10 reviews) | 9.4 (8 reviews) | #### Resolution | Feature | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **Attack Mitigation** | Feature Not Available | 9.6 (8 reviews) | | **Network Monitoring** | Feature Not Available | 9.6 (8 reviews) | | **Security Monitoring** | Feature Not Available | 9.6 (8 reviews) | | **Anomoly Detection** | Feature Not Available | 9.8 (8 reviews) | | **Resolution Automation** | Feature Not Available | Not enough data | --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [DDoS Protection Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/ddos-protection) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | Arbor Threat Mitigation System | Imperva DDoS Protection | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 11.4% | 8.3% | | **Mid-Market** | 29.5% | 66.7% | | **Enterprise** | 59.1% | 25.0% | ### By Industry #### Arbor Threat Mitigation System - **Telecommunications:** 25.0% - **Computer & Network Security:** 13.6% - **Information Technology and Services:** 11.4% - **Financial Services:** 11.4% - **Internet:** 9.1% - **Banking:** 6.8% - **Higher Education:** 4.5% - **Utilities:** 2.3% - **Retail:** 2.3% - **Research:** 2.3% - **Other:** 11.4% #### Imperva DDoS Protection - **Information Technology and Services:** 33.3% - **Computer & Network Security:** 16.7% - **Pharmaceuticals:** 8.3% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 8.3% - **Government Administration:** 8.3% - **Financial Services:** 8.3% - **Computer Software:** 8.3% - **Automotive:** 8.3% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to Arbor Threat Mitigation System - [Cloudflare Application Security and Performance](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (611 reviews) - [HAProxy](https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (900 reviews) - [DataDome](https://www.g2.com/products/datadome/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (232 reviews) - [Radware DefensePro](https://www.g2.com/products/radware-defensepro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (37 reviews) - [F5 NGINX](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (107 reviews) - [Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service](https://www.g2.com/products/radware-cloud-ddos-protection-service/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (23 reviews) - [Webroot DNS Protection](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-webroot-dns-protection/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (86 reviews) - [Akamai Prolexic Routed](https://www.g2.com/products/akamai-prolexic-routed/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (11 reviews) - [Link11](https://www.g2.com/products/link11/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (44 reviews) - [Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)](https://www.g2.com/products/imperva-web-application-firewall-waf/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (41 reviews) ### Alternatives to Imperva DDoS Protection - [Cloudflare Application Security and Performance](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (611 reviews) - [HAProxy](https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (900 reviews) - [DataDome](https://www.g2.com/products/datadome/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (232 reviews) - [AWS Shield](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-shield/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (14 reviews) - [Radware DefensePro](https://www.g2.com/products/radware-defensepro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (37 reviews) - [F5 NGINX](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (107 reviews) - [Webroot DNS Protection](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-webroot-dns-protection/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (86 reviews) - [Akamai Prolexic Routed](https://www.g2.com/products/akamai-prolexic-routed/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (11 reviews) - [Kaspersky DDoS Protection](https://www.g2.com/products/kaspersky-ddos-protection/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (34 reviews) - [Link11](https://www.g2.com/products/link11/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (44 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### Arbor Threat Mitigation System - Title: [How can the value of DDoS protection investments be demonstrated internally?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-the-value-of-ddos-protection-investments-be-demonstrated-internally) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "<p>It also helps to compare costs of protection vs. potential loss from a single major outage.</p>" - Title: [How can false positives be minimized during DDoS mitigation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-false-positives-be-minimized-during-ddos-mitigation) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "<p>There’s always a tradeoff, so tuning should prioritize protecting critical user flows first.</p>" - Title: [How can multi-vector DDoS attacks be effectively handled?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-multi-vector-ddos-attacks-be-effectively-handled) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "<p>Automation helps, but teams still need clear prioritization logic to decide which vector to suppress first.</p>" - Title: [How can response times to DDoS attacks be reduced?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-response-times-to-ddos-attacks-be-reduced) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "<p>Automation is critical, but it’s only as good as the detection accuracy feeding it.</p>" - Title: [How can organizations mitigate DDoS attacks without blocking legitimate users?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-organizations-mitigate-ddos-attacks-without-blocking-legitimate-users) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "<p>Rate limiting works best when combined with IP reputation data to avoid throttling real users on shared networks.</p>" ### Imperva DDoS Protection No discussions available for this product. --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/arbor-threat-mitigation-system-vs-imperva-ddos-protection)