Link copied to clipboard

# Arango vs Tigergraph Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/arango/tigergraph/export.csv)

ArangoTigergraph[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Arango** [

4.6/5(115)

](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews#reviews)

**Tigergraph** [

4.6/5(11)

](https://www.g2.com/products/tigergraph/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Arango**
Free Trial

**Contact Us** · ArangoGraph Insights Platform

**Tigergraph**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Arango**
3 months

Based on 5 responses

**Tigergraph**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Arango**
10 months

Based on 7 responses

**Tigergraph**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Arango**
$$$$$

**Tigergraph**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Arango**
27%

**Tigergraph**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Arango**
[
Ease of Use (14)
](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1324141&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Features (10)
](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1324101&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Poor Usability (5)
](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1323351&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Difficult Learning (4)
](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1323692&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**Tigergraph**
Not enough data

Integrations

**Arango**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_8dd78dbc186962a0fd7eb7304e30b254/firebase.png "Product Avatar Image")

Firebase

](https://www.g2.com/products/firebase/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_9e62778036006f5aa69eb9687d9396c7/mongodb.png "Product Avatar Image")

MongoDB

](https://www.g2.com/products/mongodb/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/integrations)

**Tigergraph**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**Arango**
 ![Arango screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/61132/expirable-direct-uploads_2F9bd97cfa-95cc-43ff-85e2-6dfa309960c0_2FArangoDB_Graph_Viewer.gif)

**Tigergraph**
 ![Tigergraph screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/119491/Screen-Shot-2019-10-22-at-3.24.42-PM.png)

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Arango**

8.8

8.8104

**Tigergraph**

8.5

8.59

Ease of Use

**Arango**

8.9

8.9105

**Tigergraph**

7.4

7.49

Ease of Setup

**Arango**

8.7

8.772

**Tigergraph**

7.2

7.26

Ease of Admin

**Arango**

8.7

8.755

**Tigergraph**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Arango**

8.8

8.892

**Tigergraph**

8.7

8.79

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Arango**

9.0

9.047

**Tigergraph**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Arango**

9.2

9.2104

**Tigergraph**

8.7

8.79

Features

Graph Databases[Hide 15 FeaturesShow 15 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.5

43

8.5

9

Data Management

Data Model

9.2

40

9.3(won by 0.1)

9

Data Types

8.9(won by 0.4)

41

8.5

9

Built - In Search

8.5(won by 0.2)

40

8.3

9

Event Triggers

7.5

34

8.1(won by 0.6)

9

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Query Language

9.2(won by 0.3)

41

8.9

9

Availability

Auto Sharding

8.5(won by 0.5)

29

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.0

9

Auto Recovery

8.4(won by 0.5)

30

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

7.9

8

Performance

Query Optimization

8.9(won by 0.6)

37

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.3

9

Security

Role-Based Authorization

8.2

35

8.5(won by 0.3)

9

Authentication

8.2

34

8.8(won by 0.6)

8

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Audit Logs

8.0

33

8.3(won by 0.3)

9

Encryption

8.3

36

9.1(won by 0.8)

9

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Support

Multi-Model

9.1(won by 0.8)

39

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.3

9

BI Connectors

7.8

33

7.9(won by 0.1)

8

Operating Systems

8.6

40

8.9(won by 0.3)

9

Enterprise Search Software[Hide 69 FeaturesShow 69 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.0

16

Not enough data

Compatibility

Federated Search

8.3(won by default)

11

Not enough data

File Types

7.4(won by default)

11

Not enough data

Global Language Support

8.3(won by default)

11

Not enough data

Agentic AI - Enterprise Search Software

Autonomous Task Execution

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-step Planning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-system Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adaptive Learning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Proactive Assistance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Decision Making

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI/Machine Learning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search Queries

Typo Tolerance

7.4(won by default)

12

Not enough data

Faceted Search

7.9(won by default)

12

Not enough data

Highlighting

8.1(won by default)

12

Not enough data

Natural Language

8.1(won by default)

13

Not enough data

Synonyms

Feature Not Available

Not enough data

Full Text Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI powered search - Enterprise Search Software

Generative RAG (Retrieval augmented generation)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Relevance Tuning

Not enough data

Not enough data

NLP & Semantic search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Fuzzy Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Functionality

Integrations

8.3(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Personalization

Feature Not Available

Not enough data

Search Analytics

Feature Not Available

Not enough data

Visual Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compatibility - Enterprise Search Software

File Types

Not enough data

Not enough data

Federated Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Global Language Support

Not enough data

Not enough data

Additional Functionality

Sentiment Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Import/Export

Not enough data

Not enough data

Behavior Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Storage Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Single Sign On

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multiple Data Sources

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

Forecasting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Metadata Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

File Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Text Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Drag & Drop

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Tagging

Not enough data

Not enough data

Indexing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Autocomplete

Not enough data

Not enough data

For eCommerce

Not enough data

Not enough data

Customer Database

Not enough data

Not enough data

Catalog Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query Suggestions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Document Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Content Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Task Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting & Statistics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Capture and Transfer

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Visualization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

For Enterprises

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Functionality - Enterprise Search Software

Personalization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search Queries - Enterprise Search Software

Highlighting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Faceted Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Typo Tolerance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Synonyms

Not enough data

Not enough data

Key Value Databases[Hide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.6

19

Not enough data

Data Management

Data Model

9.1(won by default)

18

|

Verified

Not enough data

Data Types

8.9(won by default)

18

|

Verified

Not enough data

Availability

Auto Sharding

9.4(won by default)

13

|

Verified

Not enough data

Auto Recovery

9.0(won by default)

13

|

Verified

Not enough data

Data Replication

8.3(won by default)

14

|

Verified

Not enough data

Performance 

Integrated Cache

8.0(won by default)

15

|

Verified

Not enough data

Security

Role-Based Authorization

7.9(won by default)

15

|

Verified

Not enough data

Authentication

8.4(won by default)

15

|

Verified

Not enough data

Audit Logs

8.1(won by default)

14

|

Verified

Not enough data

Encryption

8.7(won by default)

13

|

Verified

Not enough data

Support

Multi-Model

9.3(won by default)

17

|

Verified

Not enough data

Operating Systems

8.7(won by default)

15

|

Verified

Not enough data

Document Databases[Hide 54 FeaturesShow 54 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.1

37

Not enough data

Data Management

Data Model

9.2(won by default)

35

Not enough data

Data Types

9.1(won by default)

35

Not enough data

Built - In Search

8.6(won by default)

33

Not enough data

Event Triggers

6.8(won by default)

29

Not enough data

Semantic Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Availability

Auto Sharding

7.6(won by default)

22

Not enough data

Auto Recovery

7.6(won by default)

23

Not enough data

Data Replication

7.8(won by default)

24

Not enough data

Backup and Recovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance

Query Optimization

8.4(won by default)

32

Not enough data

Ad hoc Query

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security

Role-Based Authorization

8.0(won by default)

28

Not enough data

Authentication

7.7(won by default)

28

Not enough data

Audit Logs

7.6(won by default)

26

Not enough data

Encryption

8.0(won by default)

28

Not enough data

Support

Multi-Model

9.1(won by default)

32

Not enough data

Operating Systems

8.4(won by default)

31

Not enough data

BI Connectors

7.1(won by default)

25

Not enough data

Data Connectors

Not enough data

Not enough data

Additional Functionality

Database Conversion

Not enough data

Not enough data

Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Extraction

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automatic Backup

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Visualization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Ad hoc Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Indexing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Verification

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Capture and Transfer

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Role-Based Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Retrieval

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Third-Party Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Configuration Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Trail

Not enough data

Not enough data

For NoSQL Databases

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Import/Export

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Migration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Synchronization

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Serverless Accessibility

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multiple Data Sources

Not enough data

Not enough data

Database as a Service (DBaaS)[Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.1

20

Not enough data

Configuration

Application Performance

8.4(won by default)

19

Not enough data

Orchestration

8.1(won by default)

18

Not enough data

Database Monitoring

7.3(won by default)

18

Not enough data

Anomaly Detection

7.4(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Network Security

8.7(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Database Administration

Provisioning

7.5(won by default)

17

Not enough data

Governance

7.9(won by default)

17

Not enough data

Auditing

7.4(won by default)

16

Not enough data

Availability

Scalability

8.8(won by default)

16

Not enough data

Backup

9.1(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Archiving

8.9(won by default)

16

Not enough data

Indexing

9.0(won by default)

17

Not enough data

Security

Data Masking

7.4(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Authentication And Single Sign-On

7.9(won by default)

16

Not enough data

Data Anonymization

7.2(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Data Management

Data Replication

8.1(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Advanced Data Analytics

7.8(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

NoSQL Databases[Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Database Features

Storage

Not enough data

Not enough data

Availability

Not enough data

Not enough data

Stability

Not enough data

Not enough data

Scalability

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Manipulation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query Language

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Arango](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e25ea2e3c08688b5a248e3f3bb669eff/arango.svg "Arango")](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews)

Arango

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

57.9%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

21.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

20.2%

[![Tigergraph](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_43531f5679c36bbe2d4595f3952b54b2/tigergraph.jpg "Tigergraph")](https://www.g2.com/products/tigergraph/reviews)

Tigergraph

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

9.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

36.4%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

54.5%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

57.9%

9.1%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

21.9%

36.4%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

20.2%

54.5%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Arango](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e25ea2e3c08688b5a248e3f3bb669eff/arango.svg "Arango")](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews)
Arango

Information Technology and Services

20.9%

Computer Software

19.1%

Internet

7.0%

Financial Services

6.1%

Hospital & Health Care

5.2%

Other

41.7%

[![Tigergraph](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_43531f5679c36bbe2d4595f3952b54b2/tigergraph.jpg "Tigergraph")](https://www.g2.com/products/tigergraph/reviews)
Tigergraph

Information Technology and Services

18.2%

Computer Software

18.2%

Marketing and Advertising

9.1%

Hospital & Health Care

9.1%

Financial Services

9.1%

Other

36.4%

FAQs

## Arango vs Tigergraph FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 15, 2026

### What is the difference between Arango vs Tigergraph?

Arango and Tigergraph are both highly rated graph databases, but Arango stands out for its multi-model flexibility and ease of use, while Tigergraph is recognized for its performance and scalability in large, complex graph analytics.

| [Arango](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews) | [Tigergraph](https://www.g2.com/products/tigergraph/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.6/5 (115 reviews) | 4.6/5 (11 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Multi-model flexibility and intuitive query language | Performance and scalability for large datasets |

### How do the pricing models of Arango and Tigergraph compare?

Arango is favored by reviewers for its value, especially for startups and those seeking open-source options, while Tigergraph is noted for higher costs and being less accessible to smaller organizations.

- **Arango:** Reviewers highlight Arango as open source and not expensive for starters, making it attractive for early-stage startups and those seeking cost-effective solutions.
- **Tigergraph:** Reviewers note Tigergraph's cost is comparatively high, making it difficult for smaller organizations to adopt, despite its advanced capabilities.
- **Switching reasons:** Several reviewers mention choosing Arango over more expensive alternatives due to its pricing and open-source model.

### What are the best alternatives to Arango and Tigergraph?

The top three alternatives to Arango and Tigergraph are Neo4j Graph Database, Azure Cosmos DB, and Redis Software.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Arango](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews) | 4.6/5 (115 reviews) | — | Open source and cost-effective for startups | Multi-model flexibility and intuitive query language |
| [Tigergraph](https://www.g2.com/products/tigergraph/reviews) | 4.6/5 (11 reviews) | — | Comparatively high cost, less accessible for small organizations | Performance and scalability for large datasets |
| [Neo4j Graph Database](https://www.g2.com/products/neo4j-graph-database/reviews) | 4.5/5 (133 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Scalability and robust graph analytics |
| [Azure Cosmos DB](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-cosmos-db/reviews) | 4.2/5 (68 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Enterprise-grade scalability and integration |
| [Redis Software](https://www.g2.com/products/redis-software/reviews) | 4.5/5 (136 reviews) | Small-Business | — | High performance and in-memory data processing |

### Which Graph Databases features should I prioritize when comparing Arango and Tigergraph?

Buyers comparing Arango and Tigergraph should prioritize query language, multi-model support, scalability, ease of setup, and integration capabilities.

- **Query language:** Arango (AQL) is frequently praised for its intuitiveness and ease of learning (3 all-time mentions); Tigergraph's GSQL is noted for being feature-rich and SQL-like but has a learning curve.
- **Multi-model support:** Arango is highlighted for supporting document, graph, and key-value models in one engine; Tigergraph is focused on graph analytics.
- **Scalability:** Tigergraph is recognized for exceptional performance and scalability in large, complex graph analytics; Arango is praised for versatility but with some reviewers noting scaling challenges in clustering.
- **Ease of setup:** Arango scores 8.7, Tigergraph 7.2 on Ease of Setup, with reviewers citing Arango's straightforward onboarding and documentation.
- **Integration capabilities:** Arango is mentioned for Python and MongoDB integrations; Tigergraph reviewers highlight built-in REST API and visualization tools.

### What are the pros and cons of Arango vs Tigergraph?

Arango's headline strength is its multi-model flexibility and intuitive query language, while Tigergraph excels in performance and scalability for large datasets.

- **Arango strengths:** Multi-model support (document, graph, key-value), intuitive AQL query language (3 all-time mentions), flexibility (4 all-time mentions), ease of use (4 all-time mentions), and strong documentation (3 all-time mentions).
- **Arango trade-offs:** Steep learning curve (3 all-time mentions), improvement needed in community support and documentation for complex queries, and some challenges with clustering and scaling.
- **Tigergraph strengths:** Performance and scalability for large datasets, built-in ML capabilities, and a feature-rich, SQL-like query language (GSQL) praised for enabling deep graph analytics.
- **Tigergraph trade-offs:** Steep learning curve, higher cost making it less accessible for small organizations, and limited customization options in visualization tools.

### Is Arango or Tigergraph better for small businesses?

Arango is the better fit for small businesses, with reviewers highlighting its open-source model and cost-effectiveness for startups.

- **Arango:** No largest segment data, but reviewers from early-stage startups and small businesses consistently cite its affordability and beginner-friendly implementation.
- **Tigergraph:** No largest segment data, and reviewers note its higher cost and complexity as barriers for smaller organizations.

### Which Graph Databases platform has better integrations?

Arango is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing more frequent mentions of integration capabilities.

- **Arango:** Python (6 all-time mentions), MongoDB (5 all-time mentions).
- **Tigergraph:** Reviewers highlight the built-in REST API and visualization tools, but no third-party integration mention meets the publish floor.

### How do Arango and Tigergraph compare on customer support?

Arango and Tigergraph are rated at near-parity for Quality of Support, with scores of 8.8 and 8.7 respectively.

- **Arango:** Reviewers describe support as responsive and helpful, with several citing quick responses and effective assistance, though some note a desire for more proactive engagement.
- **Tigergraph:** Reviewers consistently report positive support experiences, highlighting helpful documentation and support resources, with no significant negative feedback.

### Which is easier to implement, Arango or Tigergraph?

Arango scores higher on Ease of Setup (8.7 vs 7.2), with reviewers describing a smoother onboarding experience than Tigergraph.

- **Arango:** Reviewers frequently mention straightforward setup, clear documentation, and ease of onboarding, especially for those new to graph databases.
- **Tigergraph:** Reviewers note a steeper learning curve and more complexity in initial setup, though the platform is recognized for its powerful capabilities once implemented.

### Which product has better Query Language?

Arango is more frequently praised for its query language, with reviewers highlighting AQL's intuitiveness and ease of learning, while Tigergraph's GSQL is noted for being feature-rich but with a steeper learning curve.

- **Arango:** Query language (AQL) receives 3 all-time mentions for intuitiveness and ease of use; reviewers consistently cite it as a key strength.
- **Tigergraph:** GSQL is described as feature-rich and similar to SQL, enabling advanced analytics, but reviewers note a learning curve for new users.

Alternatives

**Arango Alternatives**

 ![Azure Cosmos DB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_f176b4154a751d10150daa67a57b7dc5/azure-cosmos-db.jpg "Azure Cosmos DB")

[
Azure Cosmos DB
](/products/azure-cosmos-db/reviews)

 ![Redis Software](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/bc33baea6f8c2aa6f6b84dfec0a91f54/redis-software.svg "Redis Software")

[
Redis Software
](/products/redis-software/reviews)

 ![Couchbase](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/dd79f62d3c4f2a10c48a39526a14d4e7/couchbase.svg "Couchbase")

[
Couchbase
](/products/couchbase/reviews)

 ![OrientDB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b6c8dc601675e543580858cf59cc22f0/orientdb.png "OrientDB")

[
OrientDB
](/products/orientdb/reviews)

**Tigergraph Alternatives**

 ![Neo4j Graph Database](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c73a6eabb2db2ffff9a8dd4fa90e29a3/neo4j-graph-database.svg "Neo4j Graph Database")

[
Neo4j Graph Database
](/products/neo4j-graph-database/reviews)

 ![Amazon Neptune](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1528476467/amazon-neptune.svg "Amazon Neptune")

[
Amazon Neptune
](/products/amazon-neptune/reviews)

 ![Dgraph](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/435bb69d3fb894a2a274e9a81e70e1b3/dgraph.svg "Dgraph")

[
Dgraph
](/products/dgraph/reviews)

 ![Redis Software](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/bc33baea6f8c2aa6f6b84dfec0a91f54/redis-software.svg "Redis Software")

[
Redis Software
](/products/redis-software/reviews)

## Arango vs Tigergraph

- Reviewers felt that Arango meets the needs of their business better than Tigergraph.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Arango is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Arango over Tigergraph.