When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Aqua Security easier to use. However, reviewers felt that FortiCNAPP was easier to administer and do business with overall. Finally, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up.
Reviewers felt that FortiCNAPP meets the needs of their business better than Aqua Security.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that FortiCNAPP is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of FortiCNAPP over Aqua Security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aqua Security
No pricing available
FortiCNAPP
No pricing available
Free Trial
Aqua Security
No trial information available
FortiCNAPP
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
43
8.6
350
Ease of Use
8.6
55
8.3
354
Ease of Setup
8.5
46
8.5
235
Ease of Admin
8.1
35
8.6
224
Quality of Support
8.0
42
8.9
329
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Hey Gerald, apologies for letting this question go unanswered for so long. This TechTarget interview with Lacework's CEO Dan Hubbard has some good...Read more
Is lacework a SIEM?
1 Comment
JM
No, but you can send all the logs from Lacework to a SIEM.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.