Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare AppVeyor and GitHub

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
AppVeyor
AppVeyor
Star Rating
(23)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$19 per month
Browse all 3 pricing plans
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,269)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for extensive third-party integrations. In contrast, AppVeyor, while also strong with a score of 9.2, is noted for its specific focus on CI/CD workflows, which some users find less versatile for broader integration needs.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, with many users appreciating its intuitive interface and comprehensive documentation. AppVeyor, with a slightly lower score of 8.4, has been described by users as having a steeper learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with CI/CD processes.
  • G2 users highlight GitHub's Deployment Automation feature, scoring 8.9, as a standout, allowing for efficient and reliable deployment processes. AppVeyor also offers strong automation features but is often praised for its Continuous Deployment capabilities, which scored 9.0, making it particularly appealing for teams focused on rapid release cycles.
  • Users on G2 report that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many reviewers appreciating the community support and extensive resources available. In comparison, AppVeyor's support, rated at 8.4, is noted for being responsive but sometimes lacking in comprehensive documentation, which can hinder new users.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Configuration Management scored 8.8, allowing for effective management of project settings and user permissions. AppVeyor, while also strong in this area, received a slightly lower score, with users noting that its configuration options can be less flexible compared to GitHub's.
  • Users say that GitHub's Product Direction is rated at 8.9, indicating a positive outlook on future updates and features, which many users find reassuring. Conversely, AppVeyor's score of 7.3 suggests some users are less confident in its long-term development, with feedback indicating a desire for more frequent updates and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AppVeyor
Basic
$19
per month
Browse all 3 pricing plans
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
AppVeyor
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
22
9.3
1,964
Ease of Use
8.4
22
8.7
1,980
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
9.0
591
Ease of Admin
9.1
9
8.7
451
Quality of Support
8.4
17
8.8
1,571
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
7
8.9
387
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
22
8.9
1,916
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.7
157
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.6
53
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.8
109
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
8.8
258
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
8.8
210
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.8
85
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
8.8
151
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.5
236
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.6
202
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AppVeyor
AppVeyor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
68.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
18.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
13.6%
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.0%
Reviewers' Industry
AppVeyor
AppVeyor
Computer Software
40.9%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Semiconductors
4.5%
Research
4.5%
Other
31.8%
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Alternatives
AppVeyor
AppVeyor Alternatives
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
Add Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity
Add TeamCity
CircleCI
CircleCI
Add CircleCI
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Discussions
AppVeyor
AppVeyor Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
AppVeyor has no discussions with answers
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
Jagadeesh V.
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more