Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Appsmith and Material UI 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BIC Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AwareIM
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free
Appsmith
Star Rating
(66)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansMaterial UI
Star Rating
(31)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Material UISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Material UI excels in its Component Library, scoring 9.4, which reviewers mention provides a wide range of pre-built components that enhance the development process. In contrast, Appsmith's component library is less extensive, leading to a score of 7.8.
- Reviewers mention that Appsmith shines in No-Code or Low-Code functionality, achieving a score of 9.0, making it easier for non-developers to create applications. Material UI, while powerful, is more code-centric, which some users find less accessible.
- G2 users highlight that Material UI has superior Ease of Setup with a score of 9.8, indicating a smoother onboarding experience compared to Appsmith's score of 9.2, which some users feel could be improved.
- Users on G2 report that Appsmith offers better Quality of Support, with a score of 9.3, as many reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Material UI's support is rated lower at 8.2.
- Reviewers mention that both products have a perfect score of 10.0 in Product Direction, indicating strong confidence in their future development and feature enhancements, which is a significant factor for long-term users.
- Users say that Material UI's Code Extensibility is rated highly at 9.2, allowing developers to customize components extensively, while Appsmith's extensibility is perceived as more limited, affecting advanced users looking for deep customization.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Appsmith
Community
Free
Cloud and self-hosted. Our open-source, community edition is free forever and contains powerful features:
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited apps
- Unlimited datasources and widgets
Free Trial
Appsmith
Free Trial is available
Material UI
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
52
8.8
28
Ease of Use
9.1
58
8.8
28
Ease of Setup
9.2
47
9.7
11
Ease of Admin
8.9
31
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.3
46
8.2
25
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
29
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
53
10.0
28
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
7.9
22
Not enough data
9.4
22
Not enough data
7.8
21
Management
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Digital Workflows
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Forms
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Automation
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Process Automation (DPA)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.5
31
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
8.0
28
Not enough data
7.7
28
Not enough data
Data Control
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
Publishing
8.8
29
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Appsmith and Material UI are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Appsmith is categorized as AWS Marketplace, Digital Process Automation (DPA), Low-Code Development Platforms, and API Generation
Material UI has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Appsmith
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Material UI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Computer Software
13.8%
Financial Services
7.7%
Consumer Goods
6.2%
Security and Investigations
4.6%
Other
52.3%
Information Technology and Services
55.2%
Computer Software
13.8%
Internet
6.9%
Financial Services
6.9%
Program Development
3.4%
Other
13.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Appsmith has no discussions with answers
Is it a good idea to use material UI?
1 Comment
ND
yes, of course !!Read more
Material UI has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
