Compare Appsmith and Claris FileMaker

At a Glance
Appsmith
Appsmith
Star Rating
(67)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (65.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Star Rating
(577)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Browse all 4 pricing plans

Appsmith vs Claris FileMaker

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Appsmith easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.

  • Reviewers felt that Claris FileMaker meets the needs of their business better than Appsmith.
  • When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Appsmith is the preferred option.
  • For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Appsmith over Claris FileMaker.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Appsmith
Community
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Free Trial
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Appsmith
Free Trial is available
Claris FileMaker
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
53
8.9
469
Ease of Use
9.1
59
8.6
469
Ease of Setup
9.2
48
8.7
294
Ease of Admin
8.9
31
8.7
287
Quality of Support
9.3
46
8.2
406
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
29
9.0
273
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
54
7.7
463
Features by Category
Workplace Innovation PlatformsHide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
8.5
141
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
111
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
110
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
109
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
104
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
102
|
Verified
Automation
Not enough data
9.0
107
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
98
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
103
|
Verified
Development
Not enough data
7.9
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
85
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
102
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
79
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Digital Process Automation (DPA)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
8.2
9
Not enough data
Digital Workflows
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Forms
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Automation
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Process Automation (DPA)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Development PlatformsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.4
56
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
52
Not enough data
8.6
51
Not enough data
7.4
47
Not enough data
9.4
51
Not enough data
8.0
49
Not enough data
7.9
50
Not enough data
8.3
50
9.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Low-Code Development PlatformsHide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.5
32
8.5
138
Application Design
8.1
31
7.9
89
|
Verified
8.5
31
8.1
84
|
Verified
8.0
29
8.8
99
|
Verified
8.0
29
7.9
94
|
Verified
7.7
28
8.6
98
|
Verified
Data Control
8.4
29
8.7
100
|
Verified
8.9
30
8.2
101
|
Verified
8.5
28
9.0
104
|
Verified
Publishing
8.8
29
9.1
102
|
Verified
8.7
30
8.8
98
|
Verified
8.3
26
8.6
99
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Appsmith
Appsmith
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Appsmith and Claris FileMaker are categorized as Low-Code Development Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Appsmith
Appsmith
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
65.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
9.1%
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
63.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
11.2%
Reviewers' Industry
Appsmith
Appsmith
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
13.6%
Financial Services
7.6%
Consumer Goods
6.1%
Education Management
4.5%
Other
51.5%
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Computer Software
11.2%
Information Technology and Services
10.4%
Higher Education
6.1%
Education Management
5.3%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Other
62.9%
Alternatives
Appsmith
Appsmith Alternatives
Retool
Retool
Add Retool
OutSystems
OutSystems
Add OutSystems
Microsoft Power Apps
Microsoft Power Apps
Add Microsoft Power Apps
Appian
Appian
Add Appian
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker Alternatives
Agentforce 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)
Agentforce 360 Platform...
Add Agentforce 360 Platform (formerly Salesforce Platform)
Quickbase
Quickbase
Add Quickbase
Zoho Creator
Zoho Creator
Add Zoho Creator
OutSystems
OutSystems
Add OutSystems
Discussions
Appsmith
Appsmith Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Appsmith has no discussions with answers
Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker Discussions
Can I create a correlation between inventory and customer database?
4 Comments
Mike B.
MB
Yes, that is relatively easy with Filemaker ProRead more
Hello how easy is it to apply for help with framework coding in our files?
2 Comments
Erica T.
ET
Adding value lists into your solution would make data entry quicker for your end user and give you control over what data they input into your fields. When...Read more
What is FileMaker Licensing for Teams?
1 Comment
Scott H.
SH
"FileMaker Licensing For Teams", or "FLT", was a licensing option FileMaker (now Claris) offered in 2016 that attempted to make it easier for teams of five...Read more