Compare Applied Epic and OPUS 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Applied Epic
Star Rating
(1,563)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Applied EpicOPUS
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OPUSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Applied Epic excels in its Contact Management feature, scoring 8.5, which reviewers mention makes it easy to track client interactions and manage relationships effectively. In contrast, OPUS has a slightly lower score of 8.4 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust in managing contacts.
- Reviewers mention that Applied Epic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.8, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. OPUS, while still strong at 9.2, has fewer reviews, which may suggest less user experience with their support services.
- Users on G2 highlight that Applied Epic's Ease of Use is rated at 8.0, making it generally user-friendly, while OPUS scores lower at 7.3, indicating that some users find it less intuitive to navigate.
- G2 users report that Applied Epic's Task Management feature is rated at 8.5, which reviewers say helps streamline workflows effectively. OPUS, however, has a lower score of 7.1, suggesting it may lack some of the advanced task management capabilities that users desire.
- Reviewers mention that Applied Epic's Policy Management feature shines with a score of 8.9, allowing users to manage policies efficiently. OPUS, while also strong at 8.8, may not offer the same level of detail or ease of use in this area.
- Users say that Applied Epic's Claims Management feature is rated at 8.0, which reviewers appreciate for its comprehensive approach to handling claims. OPUS, with a score of 8.2, is competitive but may not provide the same depth of functionality as Applied Epic.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Applied Epic
No pricing availableOPUS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Applied Epic
No trial information availableOPUS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
1,018
9.0
8
Ease of Use
8.1
1,409
7.3
8
Ease of Setup
7.3
993
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.7
441
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
979
9.2
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
457
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
1,010
8.5
8
Features by Category
Condition Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Detection & Identification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis & Insights
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Predictive Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Statistical Tool
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Decision Making
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
7.5
715
Not enough data
8.5
785
Not enough data
8.0
723
Not enough data
7.1
650
Not enough data
7.8
771
Not enough data
7.3
614
Not enough data
8.0
772
Not enough data
8.4
782
Not enough data
Insurance Documentation
8.0
729
Not enough data
8.8
821
Not enough data
8.1
754
Not enough data
7.7
654
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Applied Epic and OPUS share no categories
Unique Categories
Applied Epic is categorized as Insurance Agency Management Systems
OPUS is categorized as Predictive Maintenance, Underwriting & Rating, Predictive Analytics, and Time Series Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Applied Epic
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OPUS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Insurance
91.7%
Accounting
3.6%
Construction
1.1%
Financial Services
0.7%
Information Technology and Services
0.3%
Other
2.5%
Telecommunications
16.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
16.7%
Accounting
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Accounting - Does your agency reconcile direct bill commission statements?
4 Comments
JJ
We changed to recording direct bill rather than reconciling about two years ago. It has been much more efficient for our accounting department. We have set...Read more
Is there a way to add taxes and fees so that it carries over into the invoicing section?
3 Comments
LM
Taxes and fees are processed as transactions to a policy. You can add custom transactions in Configure>Accounting>Transaction Codes.Read more
What is the best way to implement Best Practices for reports on renewal and new business retention?
2 Comments
TB
If you forward to me your email address I can send to you the Criteria that I use for both.Read more
OPUS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
