Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Applied Epic and OPUS

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Applied Epic
Applied Epic
Star Rating
(1,556)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Applied Epic
OPUS
OPUS
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OPUS
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Applied Epic excels in its Contact Management feature, scoring 8.5, which reviewers mention makes it easy to track client interactions and manage relationships effectively. In contrast, OPUS has a slightly lower score of 8.4 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust in managing contacts.
  • Reviewers mention that Applied Epic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.8, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. OPUS, while still strong at 9.2, has fewer reviews, which may suggest less user experience with their support services.
  • Users on G2 highlight that Applied Epic's Ease of Use is rated at 8.0, making it generally user-friendly, while OPUS scores lower at 7.3, indicating that some users find it less intuitive to navigate.
  • G2 users report that Applied Epic's Task Management feature is rated at 8.5, which reviewers say helps streamline workflows effectively. OPUS, however, has a lower score of 7.1, suggesting it may lack some of the advanced task management capabilities that users desire.
  • Reviewers mention that Applied Epic's Policy Management feature shines with a score of 8.9, allowing users to manage policies efficiently. OPUS, while also strong at 8.8, may not offer the same level of detail or ease of use in this area.
  • Users say that Applied Epic's Claims Management feature is rated at 8.0, which reviewers appreciate for its comprehensive approach to handling claims. OPUS, with a score of 8.2, is competitive but may not provide the same depth of functionality as Applied Epic.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Applied Epic
No pricing available
OPUS
No pricing available
Free Trial
Applied Epic
No trial information available
OPUS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
1,012
9.0
8
Ease of Use
8.1
1,401
7.3
8
Ease of Setup
7.3
986
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.7
440
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
974
9.2
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
457
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
1,004
8.5
8
Features by Category
Predictive MaintenanceHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Condition Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Detection & Identification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis & Insights
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Predictive Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Statistical Tool
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Decision Making
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Insurance Agency Management SystemsHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
7.9
856
Not enough data
Administration
7.5
709
Not enough data
8.5
782
Not enough data
8.0
719
Not enough data
7.1
648
Not enough data
7.8
767
Not enough data
7.3
611
Not enough data
8.0
766
Not enough data
8.4
778
Not enough data
Insurance Documentation
8.0
726
Not enough data
8.9
813
Not enough data
8.1
750
Not enough data
7.7
653
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Applied Epic
Applied Epic
OPUS
OPUS
Applied Epic and OPUS share no categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Applied Epic
Applied Epic
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
71.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
4.7%
OPUS
OPUS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
16.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
50.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Applied Epic
Applied Epic
Insurance
91.7%
Accounting
3.6%
Construction
1.1%
Financial Services
0.7%
Information Technology and Services
0.3%
Other
2.6%
OPUS
OPUS
Telecommunications
16.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
16.7%
Accounting
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Applied Epic
Applied Epic Alternatives
AMS360
AMS360
Add AMS360
QQCatalyst
QQCatalyst
Add QQCatalyst
EZLynx
EZLynx
Add EZLynx
Jenesis
Jenesis
Add Jenesis
OPUS
OPUS Alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics
Add IBM Cognos Analytics
SAP Analytics Cloud
SAP Analytics Cloud
Add SAP Analytics Cloud
Tableau
Tableau
Add Tableau
Adobe Analytics
Adobe Analytics
Add Adobe Analytics
Discussions
Applied Epic
Applied Epic Discussions
Accounting - Does your agency reconcile direct bill commission statements?
4 Comments
Is there a way to add taxes and fees so that it carries over into the invoicing section?
3 Comments
LM
Taxes and fees are processed as transactions to a policy. You can add custom transactions in Configure>Accounting>Transaction Codes.Read more
What is the best way to implement Best Practices for reports on renewal and new business retention?
2 Comments
Tina B.
TB
If you forward to me your email address I can send to you the Criteria that I use for both.Read more
OPUS
OPUS Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OPUS has no discussions with answers