Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Applause and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hackrate Ethical Hacking Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Applause
Star Rating
(39)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ApplauseOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases. In contrast, Applause shines in Test Diversity with a score of 9.3, indicating a broader range of testing options available to users.
- Reviewers mention that Applause offers superior Quality of Support, with a score of 9.4, making it a reliable partner for businesses needing assistance. Conversely, OpenText ALM Quality Center has a lower support rating of 7.7, which some users find lacking in responsiveness and helpfulness.
- G2 users highlight that Applause's Ease of Setup is notably higher at 8.6 compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 7.2, suggesting that users find Applause more user-friendly and quicker to implement in their workflows.
- Users on G2 indicate that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a strong focus on Requirements Logging, which is crucial for enterprise-level projects, while Applause's strengths lie in its Bug Reporting capabilities, with users appreciating its intuitive interface for tracking issues.
- Reviewers mention that Applause's Test Feedback functionality is rated at 8.3, which allows for effective communication of test results, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's Test History feature, rated at 8.7, provides a comprehensive view of past testing efforts, making it easier to track progress over time.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Administration features, particularly in Centralized Information and Traceability, score impressively at 9.7, which is essential for maintaining oversight in large projects, whereas Applause's focus on Automation and Organization, while effective, does not match this level of thoroughness.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Applause
No pricing availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Applause
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
37
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
37
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.6
21
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.3
22
7.2
59
Quality of Support
9.4
36
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
22
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
37
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Applause and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Applause is categorized as Mobile App Testing and Crowd Testing Tools
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Applause
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
10.5%
Retail
7.9%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Internet
5.3%
Other
63.2%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
How best we can integrate Applause to our CI/CD pipeline
1 Comment
ML
At our company we work using CI/CD based on 2 weeks sprints. WE use applause as remote testing platform basically for Exploratory testing on Staging...Read more
Applause has no more discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
