Compare Appknox and Intruder
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (58.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$$$ Per App/year
Starting at $149.00 Per Month
Appknox
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$$$ Per App/year
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Intruder
Star Rating
(206)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $149.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- According to verified reviews, Intruder excels in user experience, with many users praising its easy setup and intuitive interface. One user highlighted the autoscanner feature as a key benefit, making it simple to execute scans and stay updated on critical vulnerabilities.
- G2 reviewers report that Appknox offers comprehensive testing capabilities, particularly for jailbroken and rooted device testing. Users appreciate its alignment with OWASP Top 10 standards, which enhances its credibility in vulnerability assessments.
- Reviewers mention that Intruder provides clear prioritization of vulnerabilities, helping teams focus on the most critical issues without being overwhelmed by low-value noise. This clarity in reporting is a significant advantage for users looking to tighten their defenses effectively.
- Users say that while Appknox has strong support and covers over 130+ test cases, some find its setup process less intuitive compared to Intruder, which may lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- According to recent feedback, Intruder has a higher overall satisfaction score, with users appreciating its quality of support and responsiveness. This is reflected in its strong ratings across various metrics, indicating a reliable partnership for businesses.
- Reviewers highlight that Appknox is effective in integrating vulnerability assessments into the SDLC, but some users feel that its false positive rate could be improved, despite it being reported as low at 1%. This aspect may affect user confidence in the results.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Appknox
Appknox Essential
$$$
Per App/year
Appknox Essential plan enables the user to upload a single app for a one-time assessment or VAPT of Mobile Application.
- SAST (Static Application Security Testing).
- DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing).
- APIT (Dynamic Induced API Security Testing).
Intruder
Essential
Starting at $149.00
Per Month
Best for startups looking to stay compliant
- External scanning
- Application scanning
- 18,000+ open-source checks
Free Trial
Appknox
Free Trial is available
Intruder
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
30
9.4
159
Ease of Use
9.2
30
9.5
164
Ease of Setup
8.8
14
9.6
143
Ease of Admin
9.2
15
9.5
132
Quality of Support
9.2
30
9.7
153
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
15
9.7
125
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
28
9.8
149
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
9.7
31
Risk Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.6
31
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Threat Protection
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Not enough data
6.8
10
Administration
9.0
7
8.6
28
9.3
7
8.5
25
8.8
8
9.1
50
Analysis
9.8
7
9.4
41
9.4
9
9.2
38
8.7
9
9.6
51
Testing
8.3
6
Feature Not Available
9.1
9
8.6
20
9.0
8
8.7
29
9.1
9
9.4
39
Administration
9.5
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
Analysis
9.3
14
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Testing
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
15
8.9
6
8.9
15
8.6
6
Analysis
9.1
16
9.5
7
8.9
15
9.6
8
9.4
17
Feature Not Available
9.1
17
9.8
8
9.0
14
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.9
15
7.9
7
8.9
14
8.8
7
9.1
13
7.8
6
8.6
12
9.0
7
9.0
14
9.5
7
7.7
16
7.9
7
Performance
Not enough data
9.1
80
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
90
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
89
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.5
98
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
9.0
82
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Application
Not enough data
8.2
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
50
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Security Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
10
Security Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Asset Management
Not enough data
9.3
19
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.5
22
Not enough data
9.3
21
Not enough data
9.6
22
Risk Management
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
20
Generative AI
Not enough data
6.3
13
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Appknox and Intruder are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Appknox is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Intruder is categorized as Attack Surface Management, Exposure Management Platforms, API Security, Website Security, Vulnerability Scanner, and Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Appknox
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Intruder
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.6%
Financial Services
15.4%
Computer Software
12.8%
Banking
5.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.1%
Other
35.9%
Computer Software
21.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
7.5%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Insurance
2.5%
Other
47.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Appknox has no discussions with answers
Will Intruder's scans damage my systems?
2 Comments
NH
NoRead more
Is intruder IO safe?
1 Comment
OO
Intruder’s scanning engines are configured to be safe to use – even when scanning production systems, that said, this question does crop up from time to time...Read more
