Users report that Apache Xerces excels in data manipulation capabilities, with a score of 9.2, while XMLSpy slightly outperforms it with a score of 9.5, indicating that XMLSpy may offer more advanced features for handling XML data.
Reviewers mention that XMLSpy has a superior ease of setup, scoring a perfect 10.0 compared to Apache Xerces' 7.8, suggesting that users find XMLSpy significantly easier to implement in their environments.
G2 users highlight that Apache Xerces has a strong stability rating of 7.7, but XMLSpy shines with a higher score of 9.0, indicating that users may experience fewer issues and better performance with XMLSpy.
Users on G2 report that while both products have solid security features, Apache Xerces scores 7.9, which is slightly lower than XMLSpy's performance, suggesting that XMLSpy may provide more robust security measures.
Reviewers mention that Apache Xerces has a good quality of support with a score of 8.1, but XMLSpy edges ahead with a score of 8.3, indicating that users may find slightly better assistance and resources when using XMLSpy.
Users say that while both products cater to enterprise needs, XMLSpy has a larger market segment presence at 69.2% compared to Apache Xerces' 58.3%, which may reflect a broader acceptance and trust in XMLSpy among enterprise users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Xerces
No pricing available
XMLSpy
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Xerces
No trial information available
XMLSpy
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
11
8.8
18
Ease of Use
8.9
11
8.8
18
Ease of Setup
7.8
6
10.0
5
Ease of Admin
8.1
6
9.3
5
Quality of Support
8.1
9
8.3
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.