When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Squid easier to use and administer. However, Apache Traffic Server is easier to set up. Reviewers agreed that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
I like this tool because it is a fast and open-source cache proxy server that through reuse and caching of frequently used web pages the response time is very efficient and it is compatible with HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0.
Once downloaded there was multiple zip file to extract and it was a tiring job to extract the folder inside folder and installation procedure was too tiring. Finding solutions for some issues is also very tiring. The service is expensive a bit.
I like this system because of the ease of use in Windows and Linux, I configure everything from a text file, modify all the instructions and voila, I already have a proxy server installed. I say the use capacity I need and the IP address with the network...
The support you can have is all in Internet, and no partner can give support.
I like this tool because it is a fast and open-source cache proxy server that through reuse and caching of frequently used web pages the response time is very efficient and it is compatible with HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0.
I like this system because of the ease of use in Windows and Linux, I configure everything from a text file, modify all the instructions and voila, I already have a proxy server installed. I say the use capacity I need and the IP address with the network...
Once downloaded there was multiple zip file to extract and it was a tiring job to extract the folder inside folder and installation procedure was too tiring. Finding solutions for some issues is also very tiring. The service is expensive a bit.
The support you can have is all in Internet, and no partner can give support.