Users report that Apache Traffic Server excels in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize quick deployment, while Squid's score of 6.0 indicates a more complex setup process that may require additional time and expertise.
Reviewers mention that Apache Traffic Server offers superior "Content Delivery Acceleration" features, which enhance performance for high-traffic websites, whereas Squid, while capable, does not match the same level of efficiency in this area.
G2 users highlight that Squid provides robust "Load Balancing" capabilities, which are essential for distributing traffic evenly across servers, a feature that some users feel is less developed in Apache Traffic Server.
Users on G2 appreciate Apache Traffic Server's "Real-Time Monitoring" tools, which allow for immediate insights into traffic patterns and performance, while Squid's monitoring features are considered less intuitive and harder to navigate.
Reviewers say that both products have similar "Quality of Support" ratings, but users report that Apache Traffic Server's community and documentation are more comprehensive, making it easier to find solutions to common issues.
Users report that Squid shines in "Security Updates," with a more proactive approach to addressing vulnerabilities, while Apache Traffic Server's security features, although solid, may not be as frequently updated according to user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Traffic Server
No pricing available
Squid
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Traffic Server
No trial information available
Squid
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
14
8.6
12
Ease of Use
7.4
14
7.9
12
Ease of Setup
8.3
8
6.0
7
Ease of Admin
7.5
8
7.9
7
Quality of Support
7.1
13
7.3
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.