Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Traffic Server and Squid 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
NLX
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Traffic Server
Star Rating
(16)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache Traffic ServerSquid
Star Rating
(16)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SquidSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Traffic Server excels in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize quick deployment, while Squid's score of 6.0 indicates a more complex setup process that may require additional time and expertise.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Traffic Server offers superior "Content Delivery Acceleration" features, which enhance performance for high-traffic websites, whereas Squid, while capable, does not match the same level of efficiency in this area.
- G2 users highlight that Squid provides robust "Load Balancing" capabilities, which are essential for distributing traffic evenly across servers, a feature that some users feel is less developed in Apache Traffic Server.
- Users on G2 appreciate Apache Traffic Server's "Real-Time Monitoring" tools, which allow for immediate insights into traffic patterns and performance, while Squid's monitoring features are considered less intuitive and harder to navigate.
- Reviewers say that both products have similar "Quality of Support" ratings, but users report that Apache Traffic Server's community and documentation are more comprehensive, making it easier to find solutions to common issues.
- Users report that Squid shines in "Security Updates," with a more proactive approach to addressing vulnerabilities, while Apache Traffic Server's security features, although solid, may not be as frequently updated according to user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Traffic Server
No pricing availableSquid
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Traffic Server
No trial information availableSquid
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
14
8.6
12
Ease of Use
7.4
14
7.9
12
Ease of Setup
8.3
8
6.0
7
Ease of Admin
7.5
8
7.9
7
Quality of Support
7.1
13
7.3
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
6
7.8
6
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
10.0
12
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Modernization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Traffic Server and Squid share no categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Traffic Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Squid
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
18.8%
Telecommunications
12.5%
Airlines/Aviation
12.5%
Media Production
6.3%
Other
25.0%
Computer Software
18.8%
Education Management
12.5%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Retail
6.3%
Real Estate
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Traffic Server has no discussions with answers
Squid has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
