Users report that Apache Traffic Server excels in network capacity with a score of 9.4, making it a strong choice for businesses that require high throughput. In contrast, HAProxy also performs well but has a slightly lower score of 9.1 in this area.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy offers superior quality of support with a score of 9.1 compared to Apache Traffic Server's 7.1. This indicates that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with HAProxy.
G2 users highlight that Apache Traffic Server has a robust logging and reporting feature, scoring 8.6, which is beneficial for monitoring traffic patterns. However, HAProxy's logging capabilities are also strong, with a score of 8.7, indicating a slight edge in usability.
Users on G2 report that HAProxy shines in ease of use with a score of 8.7, while Apache Traffic Server lags behind at 7.4. This suggests that new users may find HAProxy more intuitive to navigate.
Reviewers mention that both products have strong API integrations, but Apache Traffic Server scores higher at 9.2 compared to HAProxy's 9.1. This could be a deciding factor for businesses that rely heavily on API connectivity.
Users say that HAProxy's scalability is impressive, with a score of 9.2, making it suitable for growing businesses. Apache Traffic Server also performs well in this area but does not quite match HAProxy's capabilities.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.