Users report that Play's ease of setup is a strong point, with a score of 8.3, while Apache Struts, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its slightly better setup experience, making it easier for teams to get started quickly.
Reviewers mention that Play excels in meeting requirements with a score of 7.8, but Apache Struts outperforms it with a score of 8.4, indicating that Struts may better align with user needs and expectations.
G2 users highlight that Play has a lower quality of support rating at 7.4 compared to Apache Struts' 7.6, suggesting that users may find more reliable assistance when using Struts.
Users on G2 report that Play has a more favorable product direction score of 7.3, indicating a positive outlook for future updates, while Apache Struts lags behind with a score of 5.3, which may raise concerns about its long-term viability.
Reviewers say that Play is particularly favored by small businesses, with 53.8% of reviews coming from this segment, while Apache Struts is more popular among mid-market users, as indicated by 71.4% of its reviews, suggesting different target audiences for each product.
Users say that while both products have similar star ratings (4.1 for Play and 4.0 for Apache Struts), the total number of reviews for Struts (21) compared to Play (13) may indicate a more established user base and potentially more comprehensive feedback on its features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Struts
No pricing available
Play
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Struts
No trial information available
Play
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
7.8
13
Ease of Use
7.5
16
7.4
13
Ease of Setup
8.7
5
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
6.7
6
Quality of Support
7.6
16
7.4
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.