Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Solr and Microsoft Bing Web Search API 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cludo Search
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SearchStax
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (49.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Solr
Star Rating
(26)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache SolrMicrosoft Bing Web Search API
Star Rating
(305)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Bing Web Search APISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Solr excels in faceted search capabilities, scoring 8.1, which allows for better filtering and navigation of search results, while Microsoft Bing Web Search API scores slightly higher at 8.2, indicating a competitive edge in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Bing Web Search API offers superior ease of setup with a score of 8.3 compared to Apache Solr's 6.4, making it a more user-friendly option for those looking to implement a search solution quickly.
- G2 users highlight that Apache Solr has strong typo tolerance with a score of 8.1, which is comparable to Microsoft Bing Web Search API's score of 8.3, suggesting both products handle user input errors effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Microsoft Bing Web Search API shines in integrations, achieving a score of 8.5, while Apache Solr lags behind at 6.9, indicating that Bing may offer more seamless connections with other tools and platforms.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Microsoft Bing Web Search API is rated at 8.5, significantly higher than Apache Solr's 6.3, suggesting that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with Bing.
- Users say that both products perform well in natural language processing, with Apache Solr scoring 8.1 and Microsoft Bing Web Search API at 8.4, indicating that both can effectively understand and process user queries in a conversational manner.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Solr
No pricing availableMicrosoft Bing Web Search API
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Solr
No trial information availableMicrosoft Bing Web Search API
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
24
8.5
272
Ease of Use
7.5
24
8.7
276
Ease of Setup
6.4
11
8.4
55
Ease of Admin
7.7
11
8.1
48
Quality of Support
6.3
20
8.5
236
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.2
9
8.1
47
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
24
9.0
275
Features by Category
Compatibility
6.4
6
8.4
203
7.5
6
8.3
204
8.1
6
8.7
200
Agentic AI - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Search Queries
8.1
6
8.3
208
8.1
6
8.2
196
7.5
6
8.4
206
8.3
6
8.4
201
8.1
6
8.4
201
AI powered search - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
7.5
6
8.3
207
7.5
6
8.3
205
6.9
6
8.5
184
Compatibility - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Search Queries - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Site Search
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Search Experience Management - Site Search
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Site Search
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Site Search
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Solr and Microsoft Bing Web Search API are categorized as Enterprise Search Software
Unique Categories
Apache Solr is categorized as Site Search Software
Microsoft Bing Web Search API has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Solr
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Bing Web Search API
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
20.8%
Online Media
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Staffing and Recruiting
4.2%
Other
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Computer Software
13.9%
Education Management
4.6%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Construction
4.0%
Other
56.4%
Discussions
Apache Solr has no discussions with answers
What is Microsoft Bing Web Search API used for?
2 Comments
JP
Add free / searches within my location with thousand of results. It also helps with computational conversation queries. Read more
Microsoft Bing Web Search API has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
