Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Parquet and Hbase 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Parquet
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache ParquetHbase
Star Rating
(114)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HbaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hbase excels in its auto sharding capabilities, scoring 8.6, which allows for efficient data distribution across nodes, while Apache Parquet's auto sharding is rated lower at 7.4, indicating potential challenges in scaling under heavy loads.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Parquet shines in data types support, achieving a score of 8.8, which is significantly higher than Hbase's 7.2. This makes Parquet a better choice for users needing to handle diverse data formats effectively.
- G2 users highlight that Hbase's integrated cache feature, rated at 7.0, may not meet the performance expectations for high-speed data access, whereas Apache Parquet's integrated cache is rated at 8.6, suggesting superior performance in data retrieval.
- Users on G2 emphasize that Apache Parquet offers robust auto recovery features with a score of 8.2, which is a critical advantage over Hbase's lower score of 6.1, indicating that Parquet may provide better data resilience in case of failures.
- Reviewers say that Hbase's role-based authorization is rated at 7.7, which may not be as comprehensive as Apache Parquet's 9.0, suggesting that Parquet provides stronger security measures for managing user access and permissions.
- Users report that while Hbase has a solid overall rating for stability at 7.9, Apache Parquet stands out with a remarkable score of 9.7, indicating that Parquet is perceived as a more reliable option for production environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Parquet
No pricing availableHbase
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Parquet
No trial information availableHbase
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
21
8.2
90
Ease of Use
7.7
22
7.6
90
Ease of Setup
7.2
9
7.3
40
Ease of Admin
7.6
9
7.0
40
Quality of Support
8.1
19
7.6
82
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
8
8.0
34
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
25
8.2
85
Features by Category
Storage
9.0
13
8.1
6
8.8
12
7.2
6
Availability
7.4
14
8.6
6
8.2
12
6.1
6
8.8
12
7.2
6
Performance
8.6
12
7.0
5
Security
9.0
12
7.7
5
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
6.7
5
Support
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Parquet and Hbase are categorized as Columnar Databases
Unique Categories
Apache Parquet has no unique categories
Hbase is categorized as Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Parquet
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
38.5%
Information Technology and Services
19.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Education Management
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
3.8%
Other
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Computer Software
22.3%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Financial Services
4.9%
Other
32.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Parquet has no discussions with answers
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
Hbase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
