Link copied to clipboard # Apache Oozie vs Control-M Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/apache-oozie/control-m/export.csv) Apache OozieControl-M[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Apache Oozie** No pricing available **Control-M** **Starting at $29,000.00** 500 Executions Per Month · Starter Pack (SaaS) **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Apache Oozie** $$$$$ **Control-M** $$$$$ Average Discount **Apache Oozie** Not enough reviews yet **Control-M** 8% Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Apache Oozie** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Control-M** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Apache Oozie** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Control-M** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Apache Oozie** Not enough data **Control-M** [ Ease of Use (50) ](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1403266&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Automation (33) ](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1403246&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Complexity (35) ](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1975499&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Learning Curve (24) ](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1975488&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **Apache Oozie** Not enough data **Control-M** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_dc218a7b4e898f9384267cbd98b09aa8/apache-airflow.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Apache Airflow ](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-airflow/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-glue.jpg "Product Avatar Image") AWS Glue ](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-glue/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-lambda.jpg "Product Avatar Image") AWS Lambda ](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-lambda/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_898bef15d79b65ce781f705f68ac1ed6/microsoft-hands-on-labs.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Azure DevOps Labs ](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-labs/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/integrations) Screenshots **Apache Oozie** No screenshot available **Control-M** ![Control-M screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1807732/CTM-screen-2607-mon-aipilot.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Apache Oozie** **8.3** /10 Based on 21 responses **Control-M** **9.0** /10 Based on 126 responses Ease of Use **Apache Oozie** **8.4** /10 Based on 21 responses **Control-M** **8.5** /10 Based on 133 responses Ease of Setup **Apache Oozie** **8.1** /10 Based on 9 responses **Control-M** **7.9** /10 Based on 97 responses Ease of Admin **Apache Oozie** **8.1** /10 Based on 9 responses **Control-M** **8.6** /10 Based on 57 responses Quality of Support **Apache Oozie** **8.3** /10 Based on 18 responses **Control-M** **8.6** /10 Based on 127 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Apache Oozie** **8.7** /10 Based on 9 responses **Control-M** **9.0** /10 Based on 58 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Apache Oozie** **8.3** /10 Based on 21 responses **Control-M** **8.9** /10 Based on 116 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Workload Automation **8.3** /10 Based on 19 responses **8.6** /10 Based on 111 responses Continuous Delivery Not enough data **9.0** /10 Based on 5 responses Continuous Integration Not enough data **10.0** /10 Based on 7 responses Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Big Data Processing and Distribution Not enough data **8.3** /10 Based on 10 responses User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.1% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.1% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 24.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.5% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 24.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.5% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Apache Oozie](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_385ee6c7f758d008c6c2012736b57159/apache-oozie.png "Apache Oozie")](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-oozie/reviews) Apache Oozie Banking 15.4% Computer Software 15.4% Hospital & Health Care 7.7% Internet 7.7% Telecommunications 7.7% Other 46.2% [![Control-M](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c63bb31691a12cb80bea945174c3ca6e/control-m.svg "Control-M")](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews) Control-M Information Technology and Services 25.0% Financial Services 9.0% Computer Software 9.0% Banking 8.3% Telecommunications 5.8% Other 42.9% Alternatives **Apache Oozie Alternatives** ![PagerDuty](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d1d426a36640ab716bab27171994b964/pagerduty.svg "PagerDuty") [ PagerDuty ](/products/pagerduty/reviews) ![Tines Stories](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/308aa01878587e0f4031de9fd36cb216/tines-stories.svg "Tines Stories") [ Tines Stories ](/products/tines-stories/reviews) ![AutoSys Workload Automation](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_9a4e65d96ae8b79797b6d5f627ce1af8/autosys-workload-automation.jpg "AutoSys Workload Automation") [ AutoSys Workload Automation ](/products/autosys-workload-automation/reviews) ![JAMS Scheduler](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c7c2a6c7fac0499a5d3626312d8a80e9/jams-scheduler.svg "JAMS Scheduler") [ JAMS Scheduler ](/products/jams-scheduler/reviews) **Control-M Alternatives** ![Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_7b1e34d1cfcc265beee0d9b4290461fa/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform.jpg "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform") [ Red Hat Ansible Automation... ](/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) ![Snowflake](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1544409170/snowflake.svg "Snowflake") [ Snowflake ](/products/snowflake/reviews) ![RunMyJobs](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0e56d2e69ae7fe5fbfe1ba6da89225d5/runmyjobs.svg "RunMyJobs") [ RunMyJobs ](/products/runmyjobs/reviews) ![JAMS Scheduler](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c7c2a6c7fac0499a5d3626312d8a80e9/jams-scheduler.svg "JAMS Scheduler") [ JAMS Scheduler ](/products/jams-scheduler/reviews) ## Apache Oozie vs Control-M FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between Control-M vs Apache Oozie? Control-M stands out for its higher reviewer satisfaction, broader enterprise adoption, and stronger support scores compared to Apache Oozie. | [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews) | [Apache Oozie](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-oozie/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.4/5 (176 reviews) | 4.1/5 (27 reviews) | | Enterprise | Enterprise | | 8.0 | 8.1 | | 8.6 | 8.3 | | Ease of Use (50 all-time mentions) | — | ### How do the pricing models of Control-M and Apache Oozie compare? Control-M receives lower value satisfaction than Apache Oozie, with reviewers frequently citing high licensing costs for Control-M. - **Control-M:** In recent reviews, many reviewers describe Control-M as expensive and geared toward large enterprises, with licensing costs noted as a significant trade-off. - **Apache Oozie:** Reviewers highlight that Apache Oozie is free and open source, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations seeking lower total cost of ownership. ### What are the best alternatives to Control-M and Apache Oozie? The top three alternatives to Control-M and Apache Oozie are Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Snowflake, and PagerDuty. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews) | 4.4/5 (176 reviews) | Enterprise | Expensive, enterprise-focused | Ease of Use (50 all-time mentions) | | [Apache Oozie](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-oozie/reviews) | 4.1/5 (27 reviews) | Enterprise | Free, open source | Easy scheduling and Hadoop integration | | [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) | 4.6/5 (377 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Automation capabilities | | [Snowflake](https://www.g2.com/products/snowflake/reviews) | 4.5/5 (763 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Scalability and performance | | [PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/products/pagerduty/reviews) | 4.5/5 (972 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Incident response and alerting | ### Which Workload Automation features should I prioritize when comparing Control-M and Apache Oozie? Buyers should prioritize automation capabilities, integration breadth, ease of use, monitoring and alerting, and centralized management when comparing Control-M and Apache Oozie. - **Automation:** Control-M: 33 all-time mentions; Apache Oozie: temporal-qualitative support for workflow automation. - **Integration breadth:** Control-M: Integrates with GitHub, Jira, Jenkins (all-time mentions: 2, 2, 1); Apache Oozie: Strong Hadoop ecosystem integration. - **Ease of Use:** Control-M: 50 all-time mentions, 8.7 score; Apache Oozie: 8.4 score. - **Monitoring and alerting:** Control-M: 26 all-time mentions; Apache Oozie: Reviewers cite logging and alerting as strengths. - **Centralized management:** Control-M: 20 all-time mentions; Apache Oozie: Reviewers highlight centralized workflow scheduling for Hadoop jobs. ### What are the pros and cons of Control-M vs Apache Oozie? Control-M's headline strength is centralized enterprise automation, while Apache Oozie excels in Hadoop-native workflow scheduling and cost-effectiveness. - **Control-M strengths:** Centralized management (20 all-time mentions), automation (33), ease of use (50), monitoring (26), reliability (19), and broad integration support. - **Control-M trade-offs:** Complexity (35 all-time mentions), steep learning curve (24), complex UI (19), and high licensing costs (19). - **Apache Oozie strengths:** Free and open source, strong Hadoop integration, easy scheduling for Hadoop jobs, and flexibility in supporting multiple job types. - **Apache Oozie trade-offs:** Outdated or limited UI, less interactive workflow design, limited to Hadoop environments, and less robust error handling compared to enterprise tools. ### Is Control-M or Apache Oozie better for small businesses? Apache Oozie is a better fit for small businesses due to its open-source model and lower cost, while Control-M is primarily adopted by enterprises. - **Control-M:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers consistently note high licensing costs and complexity, making it less suitable for small businesses. - **Apache Oozie:** Largest segment is Enterprise, but reviewers highlight its free, open-source nature and suitability for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions. ### Which Workload Automation platform has better integrations? Control-M is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing a broader range of third-party tool connections. - **Control-M:** Integrates with GitHub (2 all-time mentions), Jira (2), and Jenkins (1), with reviewers highlighting its ability to connect with legacy and modern platforms. - **Apache Oozie:** Reviewers highlight strong integration with the Hadoop ecosystem and support for MapReduce, Hive, Pig, and shell scripts. ### How do Control-M and Apache Oozie compare on customer support? Control-M and Apache Oozie are rated within 0.3 points on Quality of Support, indicating near parity (Control-M 8.6, Apache Oozie 8.3). - **Control-M:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, with scores of 6-7/10 in recent reviews, but note that complex issues and onboarding may require additional assistance. - **Apache Oozie:** Reviewers rate support as solid (scores of 5-7/10), with positive feedback on documentation and community resources, though some desire more interactive guidance. ### Which is easier to implement, Control-M or Apache Oozie? Control-M and Apache Oozie score within 0.1 points on Ease of Setup (Control-M 8.0, Apache Oozie 8.1), indicating parity. - **Control-M:** Reviewers frequently mention a complex initial setup and configuration, with a learning curve for new users, but note improved documentation and support for installation. - **Apache Oozie:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward for Hadoop environments, with intuitive configuration for scheduling jobs, though some note challenges with XML-based workflow definitions. ### Which product has better Automation? Control-M is the stronger product for Automation, with 33 all-time reviewer mentions and higher satisfaction scores. - **Control-M:** Automation is cited in 33 all-time reviews, with strong scores for Meets Requirements (9.0) and Ease of Use (8.7), and reviewers consistently highlight automation efficiency and reliability. - **Apache Oozie:** Reviewers describe automation as a core strength for Hadoop workflows, with an 8.3 Meets Requirements score and positive feedback on scheduling and job orchestration.