Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Oozie and Control-M 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ActiveBatch
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
Apache Oozie
Star Rating
(27)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache OozieControl-M
Star Rating
(125)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
Learn more about Control-MSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Control-M excels in "Workload Processing" with a score of 9.1, while Apache Oozie follows closely with 8.9. Reviewers mention that Control-M's ability to handle complex job scheduling and dependencies is a significant advantage for enterprise environments.
- Reviewers mention that Control-M's "Error Alerts" feature, rated at 9.0, provides timely notifications that help teams address issues proactively. In contrast, Apache Oozie's error management capabilities are rated lower, with users noting that it lacks some of the advanced alerting features found in Control-M.
- G2 users highlight Control-M's superior "Job Scheduling" capabilities, scoring 9.4, which allows for intricate scheduling scenarios. Users on G2 report that Apache Oozie's scheduling is effective but not as robust, particularly in handling complex workflows.
- Users say that Control-M's "Administration Console" is user-friendly and efficient, rated at 8.5, making it easier for administrators to manage workflows. In comparison, Apache Oozie's console received a lower score of 8.0, with reviewers mentioning that it can be less intuitive for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Control-M's "Intelligent Automation" features, rated at 8.8, significantly enhance operational efficiency, allowing for automated task notifications and routine task automation. Users report that Apache Oozie, while capable, does not offer the same level of intelligent automation features.
- Users report that Control-M's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.6, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team. In contrast, Apache Oozie's support is rated slightly lower at 8.3, with some users mentioning longer response times for complex issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Oozie
No pricing availableControl-M
Starter Pack (SaaS)
Starting at $29,000.00
500 Executions Per Month
Full-featured Control-M SaaS orchestration — right-sized for growing teams and hybrid cloud apps.
- Visual Workflow Designer
- Cloud native & hybrid app integration
- API jobs, event triggers, file transfer
Free Trial
Apache Oozie
No trial information availableControl-M
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
21
9.0
82
Ease of Use
8.4
21
8.7
83
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
8.2
50
Ease of Admin
8.1
9
8.6
36
Quality of Support
8.3
18
8.6
79
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
9.0
37
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
21
8.5
79
Features by Category
Automation
8.9
17
9.0
48
8.0
17
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.1
25
Administration
8.0
15
7.9
42
8.9
16
8.9
46
7.8
16
8.3
40
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Functionality
8.9
18
9.4
52
7.9
13
8.2
40
Not enough data
8.5
27
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.2
6
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Oozie and Control-M are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
Apache Oozie has no unique categories
Control-M is categorized as Runbook Automation, Big Data Processing and Distribution, iPaaS, Build Automation, Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery, and Big Data Integration Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Oozie
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Control-M
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
15.4%
Banking
15.4%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Internet
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Financial Services
8.4%
Banking
8.4%
Retail
7.5%
Insurance
6.5%
Other
43.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which job included in Apache oozie?
1 Comment
JC
Mostly Spark jobs where source and destination tables are defined correctly in oozie propertiesRead more
Apache Oozie has no more discussions with answers
What does control-M software do?
1 Comment
SS
I used it in banking requirrd to automate job and scheduler.Read more
Is Control-M an ETL tool?
1 Comment
LV
Yes. Control-M is used for scheduling and monitoring the jobs in ETL.Read more
What is workflow in control-M?
1 Comment
LV
Control-M Workflow Insights provides valuable dashboards that give users in-depth observability to continuously monitor and improve performance of the...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
