Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Maven and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00 1 users
Apache Maven
Star Rating
(167)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache MavenGitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in Ease of Use with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface. In contrast, Apache Maven's score of 7.8 indicates a steeper learning curve, which some users find challenging.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Integration capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, allowing seamless connections with various tools and services. Apache Maven, while also strong with a score of 9.2, is often noted for its specific focus on build automation, which may not cater to all integration needs.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, often praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In comparison, Apache Maven's support, rated at 8.2, is seen as adequate but less responsive, leading to some frustration among users.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Deployment Automation features, scoring 8.9, streamline the process significantly, making it easier for teams to manage releases. Apache Maven, with a score of 8.9 as well, is recognized for its strong build management but may require more manual intervention during deployment.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's Task Management features, rated at 8.9, provide an intuitive way to track progress and collaborate on projects. In contrast, Apache Maven's task management capabilities are less emphasized, leading some users to seek additional tools for comprehensive project tracking.
- Users report that GitHub's Extensibility is a standout feature, scoring 8.9, allowing teams to customize their workflows effectively. Apache Maven also scores well in this area at 8.9, but users mention that its extensibility is more focused on build processes rather than broader project management needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Maven
No pricing availableGitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Apache Maven
No trial information availableGitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
139
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
7.8
139
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
8.0
52
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
8.0
48
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.2
110
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
39
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
135
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Maven and GitHub are categorized as Build Automation
Unique Categories
Apache Maven has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Maven
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.4%
Computer Software
25.8%
Financial Services
5.0%
Internet
3.1%
E-Learning
3.1%
Other
36.5%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Maven and why it is used?
1 Comment
G2
Maven is a build tool which works on POM Read more
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
