When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found IBM Storage Ceph easier to use. However, Apache Karaf is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Apache Karaf overall.
Reviewers felt that Apache Karaf meets the needs of their business better than IBM Storage Ceph.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM Storage Ceph is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IBM Storage Ceph over Apache Karaf.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Karaf
No pricing available
IBM Storage Ceph
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Karaf
No trial information available
IBM Storage Ceph
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
8.8
16
Ease of Use
7.6
14
7.9
16
Ease of Setup
8.9
6
6.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
7.3
11
Quality of Support
7.4
12
8.2
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
8.0
9
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
13
10.0
15
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Karaf
IBM Storage Ceph
Apache Karaf and IBM Storage Ceph are categorized as Runtime
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.