When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found GlusterFS easier to use. However, Apache Karaf is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Apache Karaf overall.
Reviewers felt that Apache Karaf meets the needs of their business better than GlusterFS.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that GlusterFS is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Apache Karaf over GlusterFS.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Karaf
No pricing available
GlusterFS
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Karaf
No trial information available
GlusterFS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
8.5
22
Ease of Use
7.6
14
8.0
24
Ease of Setup
8.9
6
7.8
20
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.0
20
Quality of Support
7.4
12
7.6
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
8.4
15
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
13
4.4
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Karaf
GlusterFS
Apache Karaf and GlusterFS are categorized as Runtime
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.