Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Kafka and Tray.ai 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Month
Apache Kafka
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KafkaTray.ai
Star Rating
(157)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tray.ai excels in integration capabilities, with a high score of 9.5 for Integration, while Apache Kafka scores lower at 8.9. Reviewers mention that Tray.ai's pre-built connectors and reusable connectors significantly simplify the integration process.
- Reviewers mention that Tray.ai offers superior automation features, scoring 9.5 in Automation, compared to Apache Kafka's 8.6. Users say that the automation capabilities in Tray.ai allow for seamless workflows, which enhances productivity.
- G2 users highlight that Tray.ai has a better ease of use rating at 8.2, while Apache Kafka scores 8.6. Users report that Tray.ai's user-friendly interface and flow designer make it easier for non-technical users to navigate and utilize the software effectively.
- Users on G2 mention that Apache Kafka shines in real-time processing, scoring 9.1, compared to Tray.ai's 8.6. Reviewers say that Kafka's ability to handle high-throughput data streams makes it a preferred choice for organizations needing robust real-time data processing.
- Reviewers mention that Tray.ai has a higher score in quality of support at 8.8, while Apache Kafka's support quality is rated at 7.7. Users report that Tray.ai's responsive customer service and comprehensive documentation significantly enhance the user experience.
- Users say that both products have strong data processing capabilities, but Apache Kafka leads with a score of 8.9 compared to Tray.ai's 8.3. Reviewers mention that Kafka's architecture is particularly well-suited for big data applications, making it a strong contender for enterprises focused on large-scale data processing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing availableTray.ai
Tray.io Embedded
Contact Us
Per Month
Integrate at scale
- All of the benefits
- Multi-region support
- Advanced on-premise connectivity
Free Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information availableTray.ai
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
90
8.8
123
Ease of Use
8.6
90
8.2
122
Ease of Setup
8.0
28
8.4
74
Ease of Admin
7.8
24
8.9
71
Quality of Support
7.8
81
8.8
116
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
20
9.0
69
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
87
9.1
111
Features by Category
Data
8.8
33
8.3
13
8.7
35
9.2
12
8.9
35
9.5
13
9.0
35
8.6
12
Analytics
8.3
31
8.6
7
Functionality
8.9
52
Not enough data
8.5
49
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.1
49
Not enough data
Integration
8.8
51
Not enough data
8.4
47
Not enough data
8.1
46
Not enough data
Management
8.2
42
Not enough data
8.0
42
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
6.2
14
Not enough data
6.5
16
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.4
20
Not enough data
9.5
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Development
Not enough data
9.2
58
Not enough data
8.4
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
7.8
13
Management
Not enough data
8.0
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
15
Security
Not enough data
7.3
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.9
15
|
Verified
Integration Options
Not enough data
9.0
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.3
13
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.2
10
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
8.7
15
Data
Not enough data
8.0
18
Development
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Security
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
8.4
16
Management
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.9
7
Application Integration
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
31
Not enough data
8.7
35
API Management
Not enough data
7.4
22
Not enough data
7.2
30
Not enough data
7.8
29
Not enough data
7.6
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
8.6
31
Not enough data
8.7
26
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Kafka and Tray.ai are categorized as Event Stream Processing
Unique Categories
Apache Kafka is categorized as Message Queue (MQ) and Stream Analytics
Tray.ai is categorized as iPaaS, ETL Tools, API Management, Unified APIs, and Embedded Integration Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kafka
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tray.ai
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Banking
5.8%
Retail
4.2%
Other
38.3%
Computer Software
30.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.6%
Internet
4.6%
Education Management
3.3%
Other
36.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Apache Kafka used for?
2 Comments
RS
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 Comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 Comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
Support?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tray.ai
Absolutely. We like talking with you to help you get started, coach, or co-build your dream integration. We'll pick-up your call, web-chat, email or smoke...Read more
How much does Tray cost?
1 Comment
SB
We offer several pricing packages for the Tray Platform. The lowest tier is Professional starting at $1,000 per month (billed annually) which includes 3...Read more
Trial?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tray.ai
Absolutely. Just to tray.io to request a free trial.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
