When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Apache Kafka easier to use. However, IBM MQ is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with IBM MQ overall.
Apache Kafka and IBM MQ both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM MQ is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Apache Kafka over IBM MQ.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing available
IBM MQ
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information available
IBM MQ
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
90
8.9
123
Ease of Use
8.6
91
8.2
125
Ease of Setup
8.0
29
8.2
91
Ease of Admin
7.8
24
8.0
87
Quality of Support
7.8
81
8.3
118
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 Comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 Comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
IBM offers both server and client packages.
The clients are free and readily available to download from https://ibm.com, but are not usable on their own,...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.