Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Kafka and Confluent 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Kafka
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KafkaConfluent
Star Rating
(112)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ConfluentSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Confluent excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.0, while Apache Kafka slightly outperforms it with a score of 9.1, indicating that Kafka may have a slight edge in handling real-time data streams effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Confluent's ease of setup is rated at 8.2, which is higher than Apache Kafka's 7.8, suggesting that users find Confluent more user-friendly when it comes to initial configuration.
- G2 users highlight that Confluent offers better quality of support with a score of 8.3 compared to Kafka's 7.7, indicating that users may have a more positive experience when seeking assistance with Confluent.
- Users on G2 report that Confluent shines in asynchronous messaging with a score of 9.0, while Apache Kafka does not have a specific score listed, suggesting that Confluent may provide more robust features in this area.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar reporting and analytics capabilities, each scoring 8.3, but users note that Confluent's integration capabilities are slightly better rated at 8.8 compared to Kafka's 8.7, making it a more appealing choice for those needing seamless integration.
- Users say that Confluent's performance and reliability score of 8.8 is slightly lower than Kafka's 8.9, indicating that Kafka may be perceived as more reliable in production environments, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing availableConfluent
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information availableConfluent
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
90
8.7
87
Ease of Use
8.6
90
8.4
88
Ease of Setup
8.0
28
8.2
38
Ease of Admin
7.8
24
8.1
38
Quality of Support
7.8
81
8.3
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
20
8.5
35
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
87
8.9
88
Features by Category
Data
8.8
33
8.8
63
8.7
35
8.8
59
8.9
35
8.8
63
9.0
35
9.0
63
Analytics
8.3
31
8.3
57
Functionality
8.9
52
Not enough data
8.5
49
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.1
49
Not enough data
Integration
8.8
51
Not enough data
8.4
47
Not enough data
8.1
46
Not enough data
Management
8.2
42
Not enough data
8.0
42
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.3
15
Integrations
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.2
14
Platform
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.2
14
Processing
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
17
Data Transformation
Not enough data
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Connectivity
Not enough data
8.2
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Operations
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Kafka and Confluent are categorized as Event Stream Processing and Stream Analytics
Unique Categories
Apache Kafka is categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Confluent is categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution and Big Data Analytics
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kafka
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Confluent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Banking
5.8%
Retail
4.2%
Other
38.3%
Computer Software
22.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
13.8%
Retail
5.5%
Banking
5.5%
Other
37.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Apache Kafka used for?
2 Comments
RS
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 Comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 Comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
Confluent has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
