Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Kafka and Azure Queue Storage 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Kafka
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KafkaAzure Queue Storage
Star Rating
(13)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Queue StorageSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Kafka excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring immediate data handling. In contrast, Azure Queue Storage, while effective, scores lower at 8.3 for asynchronous messaging, indicating it may not be as robust for real-time needs.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Kafka's integration capabilities are strong, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for enterprises needing to connect various data sources seamlessly. Azure Queue Storage, however, scores slightly lower at 8.6, suggesting it may not offer the same level of flexibility in application integration.
- G2 users highlight that Azure Queue Storage shines in ease of setup and administration, with scores of 9.4, making it user-friendly for teams looking to implement a messaging solution quickly. Conversely, Apache Kafka's setup and admin scores are lower at 7.8 and 7.7, respectively, indicating a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Kafka provides robust data processing capabilities with a score of 8.9, which is essential for handling large volumes of data efficiently. Azure Queue Storage, while effective, does not match this level of performance, reflecting a more basic data handling approach.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Queue Storage offers better security monitoring features, scoring 8.8 compared to Apache Kafka's 8.1. This could be a deciding factor for organizations prioritizing security in their messaging solutions.
- Reviewers say that while both products have strong cloud-based messaging capabilities, Azure Queue Storage scores higher at 9.2, indicating a more seamless experience for users operating in cloud environments compared to Apache Kafka's score of 8.4.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing availableAzure Queue Storage
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information availableAzure Queue Storage
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
90
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.6
90
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
8.0
28
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.8
24
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.8
81
8.5
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
20
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
87
7.1
8
Features by Category
Data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.9
35
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
31
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
52
8.3
7
8.5
49
7.9
7
8.3
45
9.2
6
8.1
49
7.9
7
Integration
8.8
51
8.6
6
8.4
47
8.7
5
8.1
46
7.8
6
Management
8.2
42
9.3
7
8.0
42
8.8
7
8.3
43
8.8
7
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Kafka and Azure Queue Storage are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache Kafka is categorized as Event Stream Processing and Stream Analytics
Azure Queue Storage has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kafka
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Queue Storage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Banking
5.8%
Retail
4.2%
Other
38.3%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Retail
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Libraries
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Apache Kafka used for?
2 Comments
RS
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 Comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 Comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
Are you looking for someone to put the system into practice?
1 Comment
EN
It is having someone to help you get the system up and running, if the conditions are affordable I agree to get them up and running.Read more
Azure Queue Storage has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
