Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Kafka and Apache RocketMQ 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Kafka
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KafkaApache RocketMQ
Star Rating
(19)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache RocketMQSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Kafka excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring immediate data handling. In contrast, Apache RocketMQ, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.9 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Kafka's asynchronous messaging capabilities are rated at 9.0, which is highly regarded for its efficiency in handling large volumes of messages. RocketMQ follows closely with a score of 8.9, but some users feel it lacks the same level of robustness in high-throughput scenarios.
- G2 users highlight that Kafka's integration capabilities are rated at 8.9, allowing seamless connections with various data sources and applications. RocketMQ, with a score of 8.1 for application integration, is noted to have fewer out-of-the-box integrations, which can be a limitation for some users.
- Reviewers mention that Kafka's data processing capabilities are rated at 8.9, which is praised for its ability to handle complex data streams efficiently. In comparison, RocketMQ's data processing score is not specified, but users have noted that it may not handle complex scenarios as effectively as Kafka.
- Users on G2 report that Kafka's product direction is rated at 8.7, indicating a strong commitment to ongoing improvements and features. RocketMQ, however, received a perfect score of 10.0 in this area, suggesting that users feel very confident about its future development and support.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have solid support ratings, Kafka's quality of support is rated at 7.7, slightly higher than RocketMQ's 7.6. Users appreciate Kafka's community and documentation, which they find helpful for troubleshooting and learning.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing availableApache RocketMQ
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information availableApache RocketMQ
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
90
8.5
11
Ease of Use
8.6
90
8.0
11
Ease of Setup
8.0
28
8.1
7
Ease of Admin
7.8
24
8.1
7
Quality of Support
7.8
81
7.6
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
20
8.1
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
87
10.0
10
Features by Category
Data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.9
35
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
31
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
52
8.9
6
8.5
49
7.8
6
8.3
45
8.3
6
8.1
49
8.9
6
Integration
8.8
51
8.1
6
8.4
47
8.6
6
8.1
46
7.8
6
Management
8.2
42
7.2
6
8.0
42
7.8
6
8.3
43
8.3
6
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Kafka and Apache RocketMQ are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache Kafka is categorized as Event Stream Processing and Stream Analytics
Apache RocketMQ has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kafka
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Apache RocketMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Banking
5.8%
Retail
4.2%
Other
38.3%
Information Technology and Services
26.3%
Computer Software
15.8%
Retail
10.5%
Internet
10.5%
Consumer Services
10.5%
Other
26.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Apache Kafka used for?
2 Comments
RS
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 Comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 Comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
Apache RocketMQ has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
