Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache JMeter and Tricentis Neoload 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Go1
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache JMeter
Star Rating
(156)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache JMeterTricentis Neoload
Star Rating
(31)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis NeoloadSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing with a score of 9.1, while Tricentis Neoload outperforms with a score of 9.5, indicating that Neoload may provide more robust capabilities for handling high-load scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Neoload offers superior test feedback and history features, both scoring a perfect 10.0, which allows users to gain deeper insights into their testing processes compared to JMeter's scores of 8.3 and 7.7 respectively.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis Neoload's ease of use and setup are significantly better, with scores of 9.4, making it more accessible for teams without extensive technical expertise, while JMeter's scores of 7.8 and 8.6 suggest a steeper learning curve.
- Users on G2 report that customization options in Apache JMeter are highly rated at 9.2, allowing for tailored testing scenarios, but Tricentis Neoload slightly edges out with a score of 9.7, indicating even more flexibility in adapting tests to specific needs.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Neoload's reporting capabilities are notably strong, scoring 9.6, which helps teams quickly interpret results, while JMeter's reporting score of 8.2 suggests it may require more manual effort to extract insights.
- Users say that Tricentis Neoload's reliability and thoroughness in automation are top-notch, both scoring 10.0, which is crucial for continuous testing environments, whereas JMeter's scores of 9.0 and 8.0 indicate it may not be as dependable in automated scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing availableTricentis Neoload
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache JMeter
No trial information availableTricentis Neoload
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
107
9.0
26
Ease of Use
7.8
107
9.0
26
Ease of Setup
8.6
32
8.3
12
Ease of Admin
8.5
31
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.5
91
8.3
27
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
29
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
102
9.1
25
Features by Category
Functionality
9.1
59
9.0
21
8.4
52
8.5
21
8.5
58
8.9
21
Reporting
8.2
58
9.0
21
Functionality
8.3
10
9.2
8
7.7
10
9.0
8
9.2
10
8.5
8
8.7
10
9.0
8
Automation
8.0
10
9.2
8
9.0
10
9.2
8
8.0
10
8.5
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache JMeter and Tricentis Neoload are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Apache JMeter has no unique categories
Tricentis Neoload is categorized as SAP Store
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache JMeter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis Neoload
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.7%
Computer Software
25.3%
Telecommunications
4.7%
Retail
2.0%
Program Development
2.0%
Other
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Computer Software
10.0%
Information Services
6.7%
Financial Services
6.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache JMeter has no discussions with answers
Neoload Trail License Activate
1 Comment
IC
need a comment
Read more
Tricentis Neoload has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
