Compare Apache JMeter and Postman 
Apache JMeter vs Postman
- Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing, with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for performance testing in high-load scenarios. In contrast, Postman, while strong in API testing, does not focus as heavily on stress testing capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Postman shines in API management, particularly in API monitoring with a score of 9.5, which allows users to keep track of API performance and health effectively. JMeter, however, lacks dedicated API management features.
- G2 users highlight that Postman offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.1, making it more accessible for beginners compared to JMeter's score of 7.8, which can be more complex for new users to navigate.
- Users on G2 report that JMeter provides extensive test coverage with a score of 9.4, allowing for a wide variety of testing scenarios, while Postman, although strong in API testing, does not match this breadth.
- Reviewers say that Postman’s collaboration features are highly rated, with a score of 8.6, enabling teams to work together seamlessly on API development. JMeter lacks similar collaborative functionalities, which can hinder team efforts.
- Users report that JMeter's customization options are robust, scoring 9.2, allowing for tailored testing setups, whereas Postman, while customizable, does not offer the same level of flexibility in test configurations.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
User interface is not complex. Easy to understand and work flow is very simple. Comes with many useful testing features. Using Jmeter we can record and run our script with simple steps. And it comes with various listeners types, When executing my test...
There are too many options to do a test. So it is a little confused sometime. And while I load test a HTTP server, some simple features are just enough. For example, I don't need so many concurrent connecting to my server, I just need to test the QPS. So in...
This tool is best to test API its look and feel is also great. I like the user interface of postman and this is light weighted . Overall user experience is very nice . First time user can use this product without any guidance. It can add another feature to...
Very sad customer service experience. Our team was new to Postman and accidentally added several more seats that were needed or used. We explained this mistake and Postman could see that these seats were never used as well. We kindly asked for a credit but...
User interface is not complex. Easy to understand and work flow is very simple. Comes with many useful testing features. Using Jmeter we can record and run our script with simple steps. And it comes with various listeners types, When executing my test...
This tool is best to test API its look and feel is also great. I like the user interface of postman and this is light weighted . Overall user experience is very nice . First time user can use this product without any guidance. It can add another feature to...
There are too many options to do a test. So it is a little confused sometime. And while I load test a HTTP server, some simple features are just enough. For example, I don't need so many concurrent connecting to my server, I just need to test the QPS. So in...
Very sad customer service experience. Our team was new to Postman and accidentally added several more seats that were needed or used. We explained this mistake and Postman could see that these seats were never used as well. We kindly asked for a credit but...
