When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Silk Performer easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers felt that Apache JMeter is easier to set up. Both products were equally easy to administer.
Apache JMeter and OpenText Silk Performer both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Silk Performer is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Silk Performer over Apache JMeter.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing available
OpenText Silk Performer
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache JMeter
No trial information available
OpenText Silk Performer
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
107
8.8
16
Ease of Use
7.8
107
8.9
16
Ease of Setup
8.7
33
8.5
10
Ease of Admin
8.5
31
8.5
10
Quality of Support
7.5
91
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
<p>As a QA expert, I employ Apache JMeter for load testing purposes. It assists in simulating various users sending requests at the same time to test the...Read more
Apache JMeter has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.