Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Apache JMeter and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Star Rating
(156)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache JMeter
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing capabilities, with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for those needing to simulate heavy loads on applications. In contrast, mabl, while strong in automation, does not focus as heavily on stress testing, which may limit its appeal for performance testing scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that JMeter offers extensive customization options, scoring 9.2, allowing users to tailor their testing environments to specific needs. However, mabl's customization features, while solid at 8.8, may not provide the same level of flexibility, which could be a drawback for users with unique testing requirements.
  • G2 users highlight that mabl shines in ease of use, achieving a score of 9.0, which is significantly higher than JMeter's 7.8. This user-friendly interface makes mabl a great option for teams looking to quickly onboard new testers without extensive training.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl's quality of support is notably high, with a score of 9.2, indicating that users feel well-supported during their testing processes. In comparison, JMeter's support quality, rated at 7.5, may leave some users seeking additional resources or community support.
  • Users on G2 report that mabl provides superior test feedback and history features, scoring 9.1 and 9.2 respectively, which help teams analyze and improve their testing strategies. JMeter, while effective, scores lower in these areas, with 8.3 for feedback and 7.7 for history, potentially making it harder for users to track and learn from past tests.
  • Reviewers say that both products are reliable, each scoring 9.0 in reliability, but mabl's thoroughness rating of 8.8 suggests it may offer a more comprehensive testing experience, ensuring that users can trust the results of their automated tests more than with JMeter.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing available
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
Apache JMeter
No trial information available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
107
8.6
28
Ease of Use
7.8
107
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.6
32
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.5
31
9.0
5
Quality of Support
7.5
91
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
29
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
102
8.7
26
Features by Category
8.6
66
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
59
Not enough data
8.4
52
Not enough data
8.5
58
Not enough data
Reporting
8.2
58
Not enough data
8.4
10
9.0
18
Functionality
8.3
10
9.1
17
7.7
10
9.2
17
9.2
10
8.8
17
8.7
10
8.5
17
Automation
8.0
10
8.3
16
9.0
10
9.0
17
8.0
10
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
mabl
mabl
Apache JMeter and mabl are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter has no unique categories
mabl
mabl is categorized as AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
39.6%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Information Technology and Services
36.7%
Computer Software
25.3%
Telecommunications
4.7%
Retail
2.0%
Program Development
2.0%
Other
29.3%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Alternatives
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Add OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Tricentis Neoload
Tricentis Neoload
Add Tricentis Neoload
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Add BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Apache JMeter has no discussions with answers
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more