When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found LoadView easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with LoadView overall.
Reviewers felt that LoadView meets the needs of their business better than Apache JMeter.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that LoadView is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of LoadView over Apache JMeter.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing available
LoadView
On-Demand
Pay As You Go
Concurrent HTTP: 1,000,000
Concurrent Browsers: 100,000
HTTP User Minute: $0.01
Browser User Minute: $0.10
Load Injector Hour: $4.00
Max Test Duration (per test): 4hrs
40+ Geo Zones/Amazon & Azure Clouds/180-Day Data Retention/Dedicated Load Injectors/Load Test Behind the Firewall
LoadView employs its own sophisticated system for performance testing, featuring a proprietary setup for test scenarios, intuitive point-and-click scripting,...Read more
Which tool is used for performance testing?
1 Comment
Official Response from LoadView
LoadView employs its own sophisticated system for performance testing, featuring a proprietary setup for test scenarios, intuitive point-and-click scripting,...Read more
What does performance testing include?
1 Comment
Official Response from LoadView
LoadView's load testing encompasses Websites, Web Apps, and APIs. It's an enterprise-class, cloud-based platform that accommodates the complexities of modern...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.