Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Jackrabbit and django CMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kontent.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Jackrabbit
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache Jackrabbitdjango CMS
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about django CMSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that django CMS excels in its "Rich Text Editor" feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for a more intuitive content creation experience compared to Apache Jackrabbit's score of 8.1. Reviewers mention that this makes it easier for non-technical users to manage content effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Jackrabbit shines in "Asset Management" with a score of 9.0, significantly higher than django CMS's 6.9. Users on G2 appreciate the robust handling of digital assets, which is crucial for organizations with extensive media libraries.
- G2 users highlight the "Approval Process" in django CMS, scoring 8.0, as a strong feature for content governance, while Apache Jackrabbit falls short with a score of 7.4. Reviewers say this makes django CMS a better choice for teams that require structured content review workflows.
- Users say that both platforms have similar scores for "Ease of Use" at 7.7, but reviewers mention that django CMS's user interface is more user-friendly for beginners, making it easier for small businesses to adopt.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Jackrabbit's "API / Integrations" feature stands out with a score of 9.2, compared to django CMS's 7.8. Users report that this flexibility allows for better integration with other systems, which is essential for larger enterprises.
- Users on G2 report that django CMS has a strong "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.3, while Apache Jackrabbit's support is rated lower at 7.4. Reviewers say this difference can significantly impact user experience, especially for businesses that may need more assistance during implementation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Jackrabbit
No pricing availabledjango CMS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Jackrabbit
No trial information availabledjango CMS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
11
8.8
10
Ease of Use
7.7
11
7.7
10
Ease of Setup
8.7
5
8.3
5
Ease of Admin
8.7
5
8.3
5
Quality of Support
7.4
11
9.3
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
5
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
6.5
10
Features by Category
Content
7.9
8
8.3
9
|
Verified
8.1
7
9.2
8
|
Verified
8.1
7
8.3
7
|
Verified
8.8
8
7.6
9
|
Verified
7.4
7
8.0
5
|
Verified
8.3
7
8.1
6
|
Verified
9.0
7
6.9
7
|
Verified
9.3
7
6.9
8
|
Verified
8.3
8
8.1
6
|
Verified
Design
6.4
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
8.9
6
|
Verified
7.7
8
9.0
5
|
Verified
8.3
7
8.1
8
|
Verified
Platform
8.1
7
8.1
6
7.9
7
7.1
7
8.8
7
7.6
9
|
Verified
8.3
8
8.0
9
|
Verified
8.3
8
8.6
6
9.3
7
8.6
6
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
7.8
6
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Web Content Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Jackrabbit and django CMS are categorized as Web Content Management
Unique Categories
Apache Jackrabbit has no unique categories
django CMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Jackrabbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
django CMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Financial Services
16.7%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Consumer Electronics
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Marketing and Advertising
27.3%
Internet
18.2%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Discussions
Apache Jackrabbit has no discussions with answers
django CMS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
