Link copied to clipboard

# Apache HTTP Server Project vs Lighttpd Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/apache-http-server-project/lighttpd/export.csv)

Apache HTTP Server ProjectLighttpd[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Apache HTTP Server Project** [

4.3/5(146)

](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-http-server-project/reviews#reviews)

**Lighttpd** [

4.3/5(11)

](https://www.g2.com/products/lighttpd/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
No pricing available

**Lighttpd**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
1 month

Based on 24 responses

**Lighttpd**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
15 months

Based on 18 responses

**Lighttpd**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
$$$$$

**Lighttpd**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
23%

**Lighttpd**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Apache HTTP Server Project**
Not enough data

**Lighttpd**
Not enough data

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

8.8

8.8128

**Lighttpd**

8.9

8.96

Ease of Use

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

7.6

7.6128

**Lighttpd**

8.1

8.16

Ease of Setup

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

8.0

8.074

**Lighttpd**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

7.6

7.673

**Lighttpd**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

7.4

7.4109

**Lighttpd**
Not enough data

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

8.0

8.051

**Lighttpd**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Apache HTTP Server Project**

7.4

7.4126

**Lighttpd**

8.1

8.16

Features

Application Server[Hide 24 FeaturesShow 24 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.6

21

Not enough data

Data Management

Data Redundancy

9.2(won by default)

17

Not enough data

Server Management

9.2(won by default)

21

Not enough data

Version and Profile Support

8.1(won by default)

18

Not enough data

Web-based frameworks

8.8(won by default)

20

Not enough data

Data exchange

8.9(won by default)

16

Not enough data

User Features

Centralized offering

7.9(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Security updates

8.8(won by default)

20

Not enough data

Real-time visibility

8.7(won by default)

17

Not enough data

Modernization

Cloud deployment

8.8(won by default)

15

Not enough data

Microservices development

8.3(won by default)

15

Not enough data

On-premises support

8.1(won by default)

14

Not enough data

Modular architecture

8.6(won by default)

17

Not enough data

AI Performance Improvement - Application Server

AI Application Scaling

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Error Prediction

Not enough data

Not enough data

Intelligent Resource Forecasting

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Anomaly Detection

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Intrusion Detection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Agentic AI - Application Server

Autonomous Task Execution

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-step Planning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-system Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adaptive Learning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Natural Language Interaction

Not enough data

Not enough data

Proactive Assistance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Decision Making

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Web Server Accelerator[Hide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance

Content Delivery Acceleration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Caching and Prefetching

Not enough data

Not enough data

Content Compression

Not enough data

Not enough data

Load Balancing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Server Clustering

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security

SSL/TLS Processing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adminstration Control

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Apache HTTP Server Project](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_dc7900ca8b7b1ffa938cf62c40bfe2bf/apache-http-server-project.png "Apache HTTP Server Project")](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-http-server-project/reviews)

Apache HTTP Server Project

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

46.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

30.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

23.4%

[![Lighttpd](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0a2f22ee82f3cf2fcb1070c3e3726103/lighttpd.png "Lighttpd")](https://www.g2.com/products/lighttpd/reviews)

Lighttpd

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

54.5%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

27.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

18.2%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

46.0%

54.5%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

30.7%

27.3%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

23.4%

18.2%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Apache HTTP Server Project](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_dc7900ca8b7b1ffa938cf62c40bfe2bf/apache-http-server-project.png "Apache HTTP Server Project")](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-http-server-project/reviews)
Apache HTTP Server Project

Information Technology and Services

26.8%

Computer Software

14.5%

Consumer Goods

5.8%

Internet

5.1%

Banking

3.6%

Other

44.2%

[![Lighttpd](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0a2f22ee82f3cf2fcb1070c3e3726103/lighttpd.png "Lighttpd")](https://www.g2.com/products/lighttpd/reviews)
Lighttpd

Computer Software

36.4%

Internet

18.2%

Professional Training & Coaching

9.1%

Information Technology and Services

9.1%

Education Management

9.1%

Other

18.2%

FAQs

## Apache HTTP Server Project vs Lighttpd FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Apache HTTP Server Project vs Lighttpd?

Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd both score 4.3/5, but Apache HTTP Server Project stands out for its extensive documentation and configurability, while Lighttpd is favored for its lightweight performance and low resource usage.

| [Apache HTTP Server Project](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-http-server-project/reviews) | [Lighttpd](https://www.g2.com/products/lighttpd/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.3/5 (146 reviews) | 4.3/5 (11 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 8.0 | — |
| 7.4 | — |
| Extensive documentation and configurability | Lightweight, low CPU and memory usage |

### How do the pricing models of Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd compare?

Reviewers consider Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd to be on par for value, with both praised for being open source and cost-effective.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project:** In recent reviews, many highlight that Apache is free, open source, and offers strong value for hosting needs without licensing costs.
- **Lighttpd:** Reviewers note Lighttpd is also free and open source, emphasizing its cost-effectiveness for high-performance systems.

### What are the best alternatives to Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd?

The top 3 alternatives to Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd are Nginx, Oracle WebLogic, and —.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Apache HTTP Server Project](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-http-server-project/reviews) | 4.3/5 (146 reviews) | — | Free and open source, strong value for hosting | Extensive documentation and configurability |
| [Lighttpd](https://www.g2.com/products/lighttpd/reviews) | 4.3/5 (11 reviews) | — | Free and open source, cost-effective for high performance | Lightweight, low CPU and memory usage |
| [Nginx](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews) | 4.6/5 (113 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | High performance and efficient resource usage |
| [Oracle WebLogic](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-weblogic/reviews) | 4.2/5 (70 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Enterprise-grade scalability and reliability |

### Which Application Server features should I prioritize when comparing Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd?

Buyers should prioritize performance under load, configurability, documentation quality, security features, and resource efficiency when comparing Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd.

- **Performance under load:** Apache HTTP Server Project reviewers frequently mention performance bottlenecks at high concurrency, while Lighttpd is praised for handling high loads efficiently.
- **Configurability:** Apache HTTP Server Project is highlighted for its modular architecture and extensive configuration options; Lighttpd is noted for simplicity but less configurability.
- **Documentation quality:** Apache HTTP Server Project benefits from extensive community documentation; Lighttpd reviewers mention a smaller community and less documentation.
- **Security features:** Apache HTTP Server Project is cited for robust SSL integration and access control; Lighttpd is praised for security but with fewer mentions of advanced features.
- **Resource efficiency:** Lighttpd is consistently described as lightweight and low on CPU/memory usage, while Apache HTTP Server Project is noted as more resource-intensive.

### What are the pros and cons of Apache HTTP Server Project vs Lighttpd?

Apache HTTP Server Project's headline strength is its configurability and documentation, while Lighttpd's is its lightweight, high-performance design.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project strengths:** Extensive documentation, highly configurable modular architecture, strong community support, robust SSL and access control, and broad OS compatibility.
- **Apache HTTP Server Project trade-offs:** Resource-intensive under high concurrency, complex configuration files, less efficient for static assets, and documentation can be challenging for beginners.
- **Lighttpd strengths:** Lightweight, low CPU and memory usage, fast setup and deployment, reliable for high-load scenarios, and open source.
- **Lighttpd trade-offs:** Smaller community, less documentation, lacks some advanced features (e.g., HTTP/2, WSGI), and compatibility issues with some Apache configurations.

### Is Apache HTTP Server Project or Lighttpd better for small businesses?

Apache HTTP Server Project is the better fit for small businesses, as reviewers frequently cite its ease of setup and strong value for small-scale deployments.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project:** Reviewers highlight its suitability for small business use, noting low cost, ease of setup, and strong community support for troubleshooting.
- **Lighttpd:** Reviewers mention its lightweight nature and cost-effectiveness, but do not specifically emphasize small business adoption.

### Which Application Server platform has better integrations?

Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd are at parity for integrations, with no recent reviewer-cited third-party integrations for either product.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project:** No recent reviews mention specific third-party integrations.
- **Lighttpd:** No recent reviews mention specific third-party integrations.

### How do Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd compare on customer support?

Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd are at parity on Quality of Support, with Apache HTTP Server Project scoring 7.4 and Lighttpd lacking a support score.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project:** Reviewers describe support as generally sufficient, with many relying on community documentation and forums for troubleshooting.
- **Lighttpd:** Reviewers note a smaller support community and less documentation, but do not report significant support issues.

### Which is easier to implement, Apache HTTP Server Project or Lighttpd?

Apache HTTP Server Project and Lighttpd are at parity on Ease of Setup, with Apache HTTP Server Project scoring 8.0 and Lighttpd lacking a setup score but receiving positive qualitative feedback.

- **Apache HTTP Server Project:** Reviewers consistently describe setup as straightforward, especially on Linux, with many citing ease of installation and configuration for common use cases.
- **Lighttpd:** Reviewers highlight fast and easy setup, with several noting its simplicity and quick deployment for high-performance needs.

Alternatives

**Apache HTTP Server Project Alternatives**

 ![F5 NGINX](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/62010ad6d5b954f5a6a5bdaf40a5d2b7/f5-nginx.svg "F5 NGINX")

[
Nginx
](/products/f5-nginx/reviews)

 ![Oracle WebLogic](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/806b35e0628d77038e9c968f2eb7bdd2/oracle-weblogic.svg "Oracle WebLogic")

[
Oracle WebLogic
](/products/oracle-weblogic/reviews)

 ![Wildfly](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bb61bd1ff061d1c5163b1db99b08b3fd/wildfly.png "Wildfly")

[
Wildfly
](/products/wildfly/reviews)

 ![LiteSpeed Web Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1544629283/litespeed-web-server.svg "LiteSpeed Web Server")

[
LiteSpeed Web Server
](/products/litespeed-web-server/reviews)

**Lighttpd Alternatives**

 ![F5 NGINX](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/62010ad6d5b954f5a6a5bdaf40a5d2b7/f5-nginx.svg "F5 NGINX")

[
Nginx
](/products/f5-nginx/reviews)

 ![LiteSpeed Web Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1544629283/litespeed-web-server.svg "LiteSpeed Web Server")

[
LiteSpeed Web Server
](/products/litespeed-web-server/reviews)

 ![Plesk](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/04ee6468b5a15c4adf984a5277afe2ea/plesk.svg "Plesk")

[
Plesk
](/products/plesk/reviews)

 ![Apache Tomcat](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d99c715051d74e27de9fd48624b6561e/apache-tomcat.png "Apache Tomcat")

[
Tomcat
](/products/apache-tomcat/reviews)