Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Flink and Play 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Flink
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache FlinkPlay
Star Rating
(13)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PlaySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Play excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick deployment. In contrast, Apache Flink, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve that some users find challenging.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Flink shines in meeting requirements with a score of 9.6, particularly for enterprise-level applications, where its robust stream processing capabilities are highly valued. Play, with a score of 7.8, may not meet the same level of complexity needed for larger-scale operations.
- G2 users highlight the quality of support for Apache Flink, scoring 8.3, which is often praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. In comparison, Play's support, rated at 7.4, has received mixed reviews, with some users expressing a desire for more comprehensive assistance.
- Users on G2 report that Play is particularly user-friendly, with an ease of use score of 7.4, making it suitable for teams without extensive technical expertise. Conversely, Apache Flink's higher ease of use score of 8.6 indicates a more intuitive interface, but it still requires a certain level of technical knowledge.
- Reviewers say that the product direction for Apache Flink is highly positive, scoring a perfect 10.0, indicating strong ongoing development and feature enhancements. Play, with a score of 7.3, has room for improvement in this area, as some users feel that updates are less frequent.
- Users report that while Play is favored by small businesses, Apache Flink's enterprise focus allows it to handle larger data streams and complex processing tasks more effectively, making it a better fit for organizations with significant data needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Flink
No pricing availablePlay
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Flink
No trial information availablePlay
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.6
12
7.8
13
Ease of Use
8.6
12
7.4
13
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
6.7
6
Quality of Support
8.3
11
7.4
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
13
7.3
13
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Flink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Play
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Telecommunications
12.5%
Financial Services
12.5%
Utilities
6.3%
Sports
6.3%
Other
37.5%
Internet
38.5%
Program Development
15.4%
Computer Software
15.4%
Think Tanks
7.7%
Newspapers
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Flink has no discussions with answers
Play has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
