Users report that Apache Flink excels in real-time data processing capabilities, with a G2 rating of 9.6 for meeting requirements, while Hibernate, primarily focused on ORM, has a lower rating of 8.7 in the same category.
Reviewers mention that Flink's ease of use is rated at 8.6, which is higher than Hibernate's 8.0, indicating that users find Flink more intuitive for stream processing tasks.
G2 users highlight that Apache Flink has a perfect product direction score of 10.0, suggesting strong confidence in its future development, whereas Hibernate's score of 7.7 indicates some concerns about its ongoing evolution.
Users on G2 report that Flink's quality of support is rated at 8.3, which is slightly better than Hibernate's 8.1, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance when using Flink.
Reviewers say that Flink is particularly beneficial for enterprises needing to handle large-scale data streams, while Hibernate is often favored by small businesses for its simplicity in database interactions.
Users mention that while both products have a strong community, Flink's community support is noted for being more active in addressing real-time processing challenges compared to Hibernate's focus on traditional database management issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Flink
No pricing available
Hibernate
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Flink
No trial information available
Hibernate
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
12
8.7
20
Ease of Use
8.6
12
8.0
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.0
5
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
11
8.1
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.