Link copied to clipboard

# Apache Derby vs HyperSQL Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/apache-derby/hypersql/export.csv)

Apache DerbyHyperSQL[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Apache Derby** [

3.8/5(23)

](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-derby/reviews#reviews)

**HyperSQL** [

4/5(22)

](https://www.g2.com/products/hypersql/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Apache Derby**
No pricing available

**HyperSQL**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Apache Derby**
Not enough reviews yet

**HyperSQL**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Apache Derby**
Not enough reviews yet

**HyperSQL**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Apache Derby**
$$$$$

**HyperSQL**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Apache Derby**
Not enough reviews yet

**HyperSQL**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Apache Derby**
Not enough data

**HyperSQL**
Not enough data

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Apache Derby**

8.2

8.222

**HyperSQL**

7.3

7.318

Ease of Use

**Apache Derby**

8.6

8.623

**HyperSQL**

8.7

8.718

Ease of Setup

**Apache Derby**

9.0

9.010

**HyperSQL**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**Apache Derby**

8.2

8.210

**HyperSQL**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Apache Derby**

8.1

8.119

**HyperSQL**

8.0

8.017

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Apache Derby**

8.0

8.09

**HyperSQL**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Apache Derby**

6.4

6.423

**HyperSQL**

5.5

5.518

Features

Relational Databases[Hide 24 FeaturesShow 24 Features](javascript:void(0);)

7.4

20

7.6

21

Management 

Data Schema

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query Language

Not enough data

Not enough data

ACID - Complaint

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Replication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Support 

Text Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Types

Not enough data

Not enough data

Languages

Not enough data

Not enough data

Operating Systems

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security

Database Locking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Control

Not enough data

Not enough data

Encryption

Not enough data

Not enough data

Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance 

Disaster Recovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Concurrency

Not enough data

Not enough data

Workload Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Advanced Indexing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query Optimizer

Not enough data

Not enough data

Database Features

Storage

7.3(tied score)

20

7.3(tied score)

16

Availability

8.0

20

8.5(won by 0.5)

16

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Stability

7.9(won by 0.5)

20

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

7.4

16

Scalability

6.7

20

7.4(won by 0.7)

15

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Security

7.0

19

7.2(won by 0.2)

15

Data Manipulation

7.3

20

7.6(won by 0.3)

16

Query Language

7.3

20

7.7(won by 0.4)

16

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Apache Derby](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b350900e1c1cde239f398145fc13d8f3/apache-derby.jpg "Apache Derby")](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-derby/reviews)

Apache Derby

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

39.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

30.4%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

30.4%

[![HyperSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_be7892f62be5fe631662c5cc854eb801/hypersql.png "HyperSQL")](https://www.g2.com/products/hypersql/reviews)

HyperSQL

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

20.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

55.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

25.0%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

39.1%

20.0%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

30.4%

55.0%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

30.4%

25.0%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Apache Derby](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b350900e1c1cde239f398145fc13d8f3/apache-derby.jpg "Apache Derby")](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-derby/reviews)
Apache Derby

Computer Software

39.1%

Information Technology and Services

13.0%

Government Administration

13.0%

Education Management

8.7%

Medical Practice

4.3%

Other

21.7%

[![HyperSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_be7892f62be5fe631662c5cc854eb801/hypersql.png "HyperSQL")](https://www.g2.com/products/hypersql/reviews)
HyperSQL

Computer Software

50.0%

Information Technology and Services

20.0%

Higher Education

10.0%

Wireless

5.0%

Internet

5.0%

Other

10.0%

FAQs

## Apache Derby vs HyperSQL FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 16, 2026

### What is the difference between HyperSQL vs Apache Derby?

HyperSQL stands out for its higher G2 rating and reviewer-cited flexibility for small projects, while Apache Derby is noted for its ease of setup and integration with Java applications.

| [HyperSQL](https://www.g2.com/products/hypersql/reviews) | [Apache Derby](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-derby/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.0/5 (22 reviews) | 3.8/5 (23 reviews) |
| — | — |
| — | 9.0 |
| 8.0 | 8.1 |
| Lightweight, flexible, and fast for small projects | Easy to set up, integrates well with Java, and suitable for embedded use |

### How do the pricing models of HyperSQL and Apache Derby compare?

HyperSQL and Apache Derby are rated at parity for value, with reviewers expressing satisfaction with both products' cost-effectiveness for small-scale and embedded use cases.

- **HyperSQL:** In recent reviews, many highlight its suitability for projects requiring less investment and a quicker development cycle.
- **Apache Derby:** Reviewers consistently note its open-source nature and low memory requirements as strong value points for prototyping and small-scale applications.

### What are the best alternatives to HyperSQL and Apache Derby?

The top three alternatives to HyperSQL and Apache Derby are MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [HyperSQL](https://www.g2.com/products/hypersql/reviews) | 4.0/5 (22) | — | — | Lightweight, flexible, and fast for small projects |
| [Apache Derby](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-derby/reviews) | 3.8/5 (23) | — | — | Easy to set up, integrates well with Java, and suitable for embedded use |
| [MySQL](https://www.g2.com/products/mysql/reviews) | 4.4/5 (1682) | Small-Business | — | High reliability and broad adoption for business-critical applications |
| [PostgreSQL](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews) | 4.4/5 (684) | Small-Business | — | Advanced SQL compliance and extensibility |
| [SQLite](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlite/reviews) | 4.3/5 (262) | Small-Business | — | Extremely lightweight and easy to embed in applications |

### Which Relational Databases features should I prioritize when comparing HyperSQL and Apache Derby?

Buyers comparing HyperSQL and Apache Derby should prioritize Ease of Setup, Quality of Support, Meets Requirements, Ease of Use, and integration with Java applications.

- **Ease of Setup:** Apache Derby scores 9.0; HyperSQL not rated.
- **Quality of Support:** HyperSQL scores 8.0; Apache Derby scores 8.1.
- **Meets Requirements:** HyperSQL scores 7.3; Apache Derby scores 8.2.
- **Ease of Use:** HyperSQL scores 8.7; Apache Derby scores 8.6.
- **Integration with Java:** Both products are Java-based and frequently cited for ease of use in Java environments.

### What are the pros and cons of HyperSQL vs Apache Derby?

HyperSQL's headline strength is its lightweight, flexible engine for small projects, while Apache Derby excels in ease of setup and Java integration.

- **HyperSQL strengths:** Lightweight and fast for small and medium-sized projects, easy installation, flexible use of memory and disk, strong SQL standard support, and multi-threaded operation.
- **HyperSQL trade-offs:** Not suitable for large transactional datasets, performance issues with multiple tables, limited scalability, and error reporting can be challenging.
- **Apache Derby strengths:** Easy to set up and configure, strong integration with Java applications, lightweight and embeddable, suitable for prototyping and small-scale apps, and granular permissions management.
- **Apache Derby trade-offs:** Not designed for large-scale enterprise use, fewer features than major competitors, slower performance compared to C/C++ databases, and documentation can be outdated or limited.

### Is HyperSQL or Apache Derby better for small businesses?

HyperSQL is the better fit for small businesses, as reflected in reviewer sentiment and its focus on lightweight, quick-deployment use cases.

- **HyperSQL:** Reviewers consistently highlight its suitability for small and medium-sized projects, ease of installation, and fast performance for lightweight applications.
- **Apache Derby:** Reviewers note its value for prototyping and embedded use, but also mention limitations in scalability and features for larger or more complex business needs.

### Which Relational Databases platform has better integrations?

HyperSQL and Apache Derby are at parity for integrations, with reviewers citing Java integration as a key strength for both platforms.

- **HyperSQL:** Reviewers frequently mention its compatibility and ease of use with Java-based applications.
- **Apache Derby:** Reviewers highlight its strong integration with Java environments and embedded use in Java applications.

### How do HyperSQL and Apache Derby compare on customer support?

HyperSQL and Apache Derby are rated at parity for Quality of Support, with scores of 8.0 and 8.1 respectively, indicating similar reviewer satisfaction.

- **HyperSQL:** Reviewers describe support as responsive and helpful, with several noting positive experiences in resolving issues.
- **Apache Derby:** Reviewers report generally positive support experiences, with some citing helpful documentation and community resources, though a few mention limited official support.

### Which is easier to implement, HyperSQL or Apache Derby?

Apache Derby is rated higher for Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, while HyperSQL is not rated on this dimension.

- **HyperSQL:** Reviewers describe installation as quick and straightforward, especially for small projects, but note a learning curve for error handling and configuration.
- **Apache Derby:** Reviewers consistently praise its ease of setup, with many stating it can be configured and running in minutes, and highlight its suitability for beginners and embedded use.

Alternatives

**Apache Derby Alternatives**

 ![MySQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_240340edca859994ec71e4490aa20022/mysql.png "MySQL")

[
MySQL
](/products/mysql/reviews)

 ![SQLite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_cf27b7c50adc61e4d44c2ef887f29fa3/sqlite.gif "SQLite")

[
SQLite
](/products/sqlite/reviews)

 ![PostgreSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_251be2af3ae607c45c14e816eaa1cf41/postgresql.png "PostgreSQL")

[
PostgreSQL
](/products/postgresql/reviews)

 ![Microsoft SQL Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sql-server.svg "Microsoft SQL Server")

[
MS SQL
](/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews)

**HyperSQL Alternatives**

 ![PostgreSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_251be2af3ae607c45c14e816eaa1cf41/postgresql.png "PostgreSQL")

[
PostgreSQL
](/products/postgresql/reviews)

 ![MySQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_240340edca859994ec71e4490aa20022/mysql.png "MySQL")

[
MySQL
](/products/mysql/reviews)

 ![Oracle Database](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_82f55e945509bff7b8009e8024cfe73c/oracle-database.jpg "Oracle Database")

[
Oracle Database
](/products/oracle-database/reviews)

 ![Microsoft SQL Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sql-server.svg "Microsoft SQL Server")

[
MS SQL
](/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews)

## Apache Derby vs HyperSQL

- Reviewers felt that Apache Derby meets the needs of their business better than HyperSQL.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Apache Derby is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Apache Derby over HyperSQL.