Users report that Apache CXF has a lower ease of use rating (6.4) compared to Netty (8.5), indicating that developers may find Netty more intuitive and user-friendly for building network applications.
Reviewers mention that Apache CXF excels in web services support, particularly with its JAX-WS and JAX-RS implementations, which are highly regarded for SOAP and RESTful services, while Netty is praised for its high-performance networking capabilities.
G2 users highlight that the quality of support for Netty (8.6) is superior to that of Apache CXF (7.7), suggesting that users may receive more timely and effective assistance when using Netty.
Users on G2 report that Apache CXF has a lower product direction score (4.2) compared to Netty (6.5), indicating that users may feel more confident in the future development and enhancements of Netty.
Reviewers say that while Apache CXF is favored for its robust features in service-oriented architecture, Netty shines in scenarios requiring high throughput and low latency, making it a better choice for real-time applications.
Users mention that the total number of reviews for Netty (18) is higher than that of Apache CXF (11), which may suggest a larger user base and more community feedback available for Netty.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache CXF
No pricing available
Netty
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache CXF
No trial information available
Netty
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.8
6
9.6
8
Ease of Use
6.4
6
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
5
8.6
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.