Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Camel and Azure Service Bus 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Camel
Star Rating
(20)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache CamelAzure Service Bus
Star Rating
(30)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Service BusSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Camel excels in its integration capabilities, particularly with its extensive library of connectors, allowing seamless communication between various systems. Reviewers mention that the "Camel Route" feature is particularly powerful for defining complex workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Service Bus shines in its reliability and scalability, especially for enterprise-level applications. Users on G2 highlight the "Message Sessions" feature as a key advantage for managing message ordering and grouping.
- G2 users indicate that Apache Camel has a higher ease of use rating (9.2) compared to Azure Service Bus (8.4), with many reviewers stating that its DSL (Domain Specific Language) makes it intuitive for developers to create integration flows.
- Users say that while Apache Camel has a strong community and support, Azure Service Bus offers more structured support options, with reviewers noting that the "Azure Support Plans" provide comprehensive assistance for enterprise users.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Camel's product direction score (7.1) is lower than Azure Service Bus's (8.3), indicating that users feel more confident in the future development and enhancements of Azure Service Bus.
- Users report that the total number of reviews for Azure Service Bus (29) compared to Apache Camel (20) suggests a broader user base, which may indicate a more established presence in the market, particularly among mid-market companies.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Camel
No pricing availableAzure Service Bus
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Camel
No trial information availableAzure Service Bus
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
15
8.3
20
Ease of Use
9.2
15
8.4
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.0
10
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.8
9
Quality of Support
8.6
12
7.8
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
8.3
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Camel and Azure Service Bus are categorized as Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Unique Categories
Apache Camel has no unique categories
Azure Service Bus has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Camel
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Service Bus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Utilities
5.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Insurance
5.0%
Other
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.8%
Education Management
10.3%
Logistics and Supply Chain
6.9%
Computer Software
6.9%
Airlines/Aviation
6.9%
Other
55.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Camel has no discussions with answers
Azure Service Bus has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
