Users report that Apache Camel excels in ease of use with a score of 9.2, while Apache Synapse has a lower score of 7.7, indicating that users find Camel more intuitive for integration tasks.
Reviewers mention that Apache Camel's quality of support is significantly better, scoring 8.6 compared to Apache Synapse's 6.1, suggesting that users feel more supported when using Camel.
G2 users highlight that Apache Camel has a more favorable product direction with 7.1% positive feedback, while Apache Synapse received a perfect score of 10.0%, indicating a strong alignment with user needs and future development.
Users on G2 report that Apache Camel has a larger number of reviews (20) compared to Apache Synapse (12), which may indicate a more established user base and community support for Camel.
Reviewers say that Apache Synapse is particularly strong in serving small businesses, with 33.3% of reviews coming from this segment, while Apache Camel has an even higher percentage at 40.0%, suggesting both products are well-suited for smaller enterprises.
Users mention that while both products are designed for integration, Apache Camel's extensive feature set, including its support for various data formats and protocols, makes it a more versatile choice for complex integration scenarios compared to Apache Synapse.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Camel
No pricing available
Apache Synapse
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Camel
No trial information available
Apache Synapse
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
15
8.3
10
Ease of Use
9.2
15
7.7
10
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
12
6.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.