Users report that GNU Make has a steeper learning curve, with an Ease of Use score of 6.9, while Apache Buildr shines in this area with a score of 8.3, making it more accessible for new users.
Reviewers mention that GNU Make's flexibility is a strong point, allowing for complex build processes, but they also note that this can lead to confusion for those unfamiliar with its syntax.
G2 users highlight that Apache Buildr's integration with Ruby makes it easier to write build scripts, which is a significant advantage for teams already using Ruby in their development process.
Users on G2 report that the quality of support for Apache Buildr is rated higher at 8.3 compared to GNU Make's 7.5, indicating a more responsive support system for users facing issues.
Reviewers say that while GNU Make has a solid product direction score of 7.1, Apache Buildr excels with a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a clearer roadmap and commitment to future enhancements.
Users report that GNU Make is favored in enterprise environments due to its robustness, but Apache Buildr is preferred by small businesses for its simplicity and ease of setup, which is reflected in its higher Ease of Setup rating.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Buildr
No pricing available
GNU Make
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache Buildr
No trial information available
GNU Make
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
6
9.4
16
Ease of Use
8.3
6
6.9
16
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
6.9
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
7
Quality of Support
8.3
6
7.5
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.