Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Apache Archiva and GitHub

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Apache Archiva
Apache Archiva
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache Archiva
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Apache Archiva, while also strong in Integrations with a score of 9.2, is noted for its more specialized focus on artifact management, which may not cater to broader integration needs.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, making it accessible for users of all skill levels. Users on G2 highlight the intuitive interface and collaborative features, while Apache Archiva, with a score of 8.3, is seen as slightly more complex, particularly for new users unfamiliar with repository management.
  • G2 users indicate that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many reviewers praising the extensive documentation and community support. In comparison, Apache Archiva's support, rated at 7.5, is perceived as less responsive, with users mentioning that they often rely on community forums for assistance.
  • Users say that GitHub's Task Management features, scoring 8.9, are robust, allowing teams to manage projects effectively with tools like GitHub Projects. Conversely, Apache Archiva does not focus on task management, which may limit its utility for teams looking for comprehensive project oversight.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment Automation capabilities, rated at 8.9, are highly regarded, enabling users to automate their deployment processes efficiently. Apache Archiva, while offering some automation features, does not match GitHub's level of sophistication in this area, which could be a drawback for teams prioritizing CI/CD workflows.
  • Users report that GitHub's Documentation is rated at 8.7, with many finding it comprehensive and user-friendly. In contrast, Apache Archiva's documentation, rated at 8.2, is noted to be less detailed, which can lead to challenges for users trying to navigate its features effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Archiva
No pricing available
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
Apache Archiva
No trial information available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
9
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
8.3
9
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
450
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.7
157
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.6
53
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.8
108
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
8.8
258
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
8.8
210
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.8
84
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
8.8
149
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.5
236
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.6
201
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Archiva
Apache Archiva
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
15.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.8%
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Apache Archiva
Apache Archiva
Computer Software
38.5%
Banking
23.1%
Restaurants
7.7%
Management Consulting
7.7%
Logistics and Supply Chain
7.7%
Other
15.4%
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Apache Archiva
Apache Archiva Alternatives
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Add Sonatype Nexus Repository
CircleCI
CircleCI
Add CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Discussions
Apache Archiva
Apache Archiva Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Apache Archiva has no discussions with answers
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
Jagadeesh V.
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more