Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache ActiveMQ
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache ActiveMQRed Hat AMQ
Star Rating
(16)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat AMQSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache ActiveMQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 8.7, while Red Hat AMQ closely follows with a score of 8.8, indicating both products are strong in this area, but ActiveMQ has a slight edge in user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Apache ActiveMQ offers better language support, scoring 8.7 compared to Red Hat AMQ's 7.9, which suggests that ActiveMQ may be more versatile for developers working with multiple programming languages.
- G2 users highlight that Apache ActiveMQ has a higher score for product direction at 8.3, compared to Red Hat AMQ's 4.8, indicating that users feel more confident about the future development and enhancements of ActiveMQ.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores for application integration, with ActiveMQ at 8.3 and Red Hat AMQ at 8.1, but ActiveMQ is noted for its broader range of plugins and integrations, making it a more flexible choice for diverse application environments.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have decent quality of support, Apache ActiveMQ scores slightly lower at 7.7 compared to Red Hat AMQ's 7.8, suggesting that users may find Red Hat's support to be marginally more responsive or helpful.
- Users say that Apache ActiveMQ has a notable advantage in latency performance, scoring 8.1, which is crucial for applications requiring real-time data processing, while Red Hat AMQ does not have a latency score listed, indicating a potential area of concern for users focused on performance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache ActiveMQ
No pricing availableRed Hat AMQ
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache ActiveMQ
No trial information availableRed Hat AMQ
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
7.6
9
Ease of Use
8.8
14
8.0
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
11
7.8
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
4.8
9
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
5
8.8
8
8.7
5
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Integration
8.3
5
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Management
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache ActiveMQ has no unique categories
Red Hat AMQ has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache ActiveMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat AMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Telecommunications
20.0%
Computer Software
13.3%
Wholesale
6.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Computer Software
37.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Pharmaceuticals
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Government Administration
6.3%
Other
25.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the difference between Kafka and ActiveMQ?
1 Comment
DT
Kafka is based on a publish-subscribe messaging model, where messages are written to topics and subscribers can consume messages from those topics. It is...Read more
Apache ActiveMQ has no more discussions with answers
Red Hat AMQ has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
