Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Apache ActiveMQ and IBM MQ

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache ActiveMQ
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Star Rating
(174)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that IBM MQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 9.0, while Apache ActiveMQ follows closely with a score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that IBM MQ's robust handling of message delivery guarantees makes it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications.
  • Reviewers mention that IBM MQ offers superior quality of support with a score of 8.3 compared to Apache ActiveMQ's 7.7. Users on G2 highlight that IBM MQ's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial for businesses that rely on timely assistance.
  • G2 users note that IBM MQ has a slightly lower ease of use rating (8.2) compared to Apache ActiveMQ (8.8). Users report that ActiveMQ's user-friendly interface and straightforward setup process make it more accessible for teams with less technical expertise.
  • Users say that IBM MQ shines in disaster recovery capabilities with a score of 7.9, while Apache ActiveMQ does not have a specific score listed for this feature. Reviewers mention that IBM MQ's built-in disaster recovery options provide peace of mind for critical business operations.
  • Reviewers mention that both products have strong application integration capabilities, with IBM MQ scoring 8.6 and Apache ActiveMQ at 8.3. Users report that IBM MQ's extensive support for various protocols enhances its integration flexibility.
  • Users on G2 highlight that IBM MQ's security monitoring features score 8.5, indicating a strong focus on security, while Apache ActiveMQ does not have a specific score for this feature. Reviewers say that IBM MQ's comprehensive security measures are essential for enterprises handling sensitive data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache ActiveMQ
No pricing available
IBM MQ
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache ActiveMQ
No trial information available
IBM MQ
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
8.9
123
Ease of Use
8.8
14
8.2
125
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
91
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
87
Quality of Support
7.7
11
8.3
118
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
85
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
8.0
116
Features by Category
8.6
6
8.3
86
Functionality
8.7
5
9.0
78
8.7
5
8.4
70
Not enough data
8.5
59
Not enough data
8.2
73
Integration
8.3
5
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
8.1
68
Management
Not enough data
8.5
69
Not enough data
8.6
65
Not enough data
8.5
65
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Business Activity MonitoringHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.1
16
Risk
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
12
Recovery
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
7.9
13
Agentic AI - Business Activity Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Apache ActiveMQ and IBM MQ are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ has no unique categories
IBM MQ
IBM MQ is categorized as Business Activity Monitoring
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
40.0%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
62.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Telecommunications
20.0%
Computer Software
13.3%
Wholesale
6.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Other
26.7%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Banking
20.3%
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Financial Services
10.1%
Insurance
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
5.1%
Other
43.0%
Alternatives
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ Alternatives
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Add MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Add RabbitMQ
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Add Google Cloud Pub/Sub
KubeMQ
KubeMQ
Add KubeMQ
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Alternatives
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Add MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Add Apache Kafka
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Add RabbitMQ
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Add Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Discussions
Apache ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ Discussions
What is the difference between Kafka and ActiveMQ?
1 Comment
David T.
DT
Kafka is based on a publish-subscribe messaging model, where messages are written to topics and subscribers can consume messages from those topics. It is...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Apache ActiveMQ has no more discussions with answers
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Discussions
What is IBM MQ used for?
2 Comments
Ahmed s.
AS
Messaging and monitoring Read more
Is IBM MQ free?
1 Comment
DA
IBM offers both server and client packages. The clients are free and readily available to download from https://ibm.com, but are not usable on their own,...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM MQ has no more discussions with answers