Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache ActiveMQ and Google Cloud Pub/Sub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache ActiveMQ
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache ActiveMQGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Pub/SubSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Pub/Sub excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 9.0, while Apache ActiveMQ follows closely with a score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that Pub/Sub's ability to handle high-throughput messaging is a significant advantage for cloud-native applications.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers superior cloud-based messaging capabilities, scoring 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for organizations looking to leverage cloud infrastructure. In contrast, Apache ActiveMQ does not have a dedicated cloud-based messaging feature, which some users find limiting.
- Users on G2 highlight that Google Cloud Pub/Sub has a more favorable ease of setup rating at 8.8, while Apache ActiveMQ lacks a score in this area. Reviewers mention that the straightforward setup process of Pub/Sub allows teams to get started quickly without extensive configuration.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Pub/Sub provides robust activity monitoring features, scoring 8.8, which helps users track message flow and system performance effectively. In comparison, Apache ActiveMQ's monitoring capabilities are perceived as less comprehensive, leading to some user frustration.
- G2 users report that Google Cloud Pub/Sub has a higher quality of support rating at 8.3 compared to Apache ActiveMQ's 7.7. Users say that the responsive support team at Google is a key factor in their satisfaction with the product.
- Users say that both products offer good application integration, with Google Cloud Pub/Sub scoring 8.9 and Apache ActiveMQ at 8.3. However, reviewers mention that Pub/Sub's seamless integration with other Google Cloud services enhances its overall functionality for users already within the Google ecosystem.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache ActiveMQ
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache ActiveMQ
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
9.2
27
Ease of Use
8.8
14
8.6
28
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.9
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
7
Quality of Support
7.7
11
8.8
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
6
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
8.3
27
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
5
9.1
13
8.7
5
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.3
14
Not enough data
7.4
12
Integration
8.3
5
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Management
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache ActiveMQ and Google Cloud Pub/Sub are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache ActiveMQ has no unique categories
Google Cloud Pub/Sub is categorized as Stream Analytics
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache ActiveMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Telecommunications
20.0%
Computer Software
13.3%
Wholesale
6.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Computer Software
21.9%
Education Management
15.6%
Marketing and Advertising
9.4%
Retail
6.3%
Information Services
6.3%
Other
40.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the difference between Kafka and ActiveMQ?
1 Comment
DT
Kafka is based on a publish-subscribe messaging model, where messages are written to topics and subscribers can consume messages from those topics. It is...Read more
Apache ActiveMQ has no more discussions with answers
Google Cloud Pub/Sub has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
