Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache ActiveMQ and Azure Queue Storage 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache ActiveMQ
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache ActiveMQAzure Queue Storage
Star Rating
(13)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Queue StorageSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache ActiveMQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 8.7, while Azure Queue Storage has a slightly lower score of 8.3, indicating that ActiveMQ may provide a more robust experience for applications requiring high-performance messaging.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Queue Storage offers superior ease of setup and administration, both scoring 9.4, which suggests that users find it more straightforward to implement and manage compared to Apache ActiveMQ, which does not have specific scores listed for these criteria.
- G2 users highlight that Apache ActiveMQ has strong language support with a score of 8.7, making it a better choice for developers working in diverse programming environments, whereas Azure Queue Storage scores lower at 7.9 in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Queue Storage has a higher quality of support with a score of 8.8 compared to Apache ActiveMQ's 7.7, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with Azure's offering.
- Reviewers mention that Apache ActiveMQ shines in policies and controls with a perfect score of 9.3, which is crucial for enterprises needing strict governance, while Azure Queue Storage does not have a comparable score in this area.
- Users say that both products have strong application integration capabilities, with Azure Queue Storage scoring 8.6 and Apache ActiveMQ at 8.3, but Azure's higher score suggests it may be more effective in connecting with other applications seamlessly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache ActiveMQ
No pricing availableAzure Queue Storage
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache ActiveMQ
No trial information availableAzure Queue Storage
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
14
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.8
14
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
11
8.5
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
14
7.1
8
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
5
8.3
7
8.7
5
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
7.9
7
Integration
8.3
5
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Management
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache ActiveMQ and Azure Queue Storage are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache ActiveMQ has no unique categories
Azure Queue Storage has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache ActiveMQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Queue Storage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Telecommunications
20.0%
Computer Software
13.3%
Wholesale
6.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Retail
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Libraries
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the difference between Kafka and ActiveMQ?
1 Comment
DT
Kafka is based on a publish-subscribe messaging model, where messages are written to topics and subscribers can consume messages from those topics. It is...Read more
Apache ActiveMQ has no more discussions with answers
Are you looking for someone to put the system into practice?
1 Comment
EN
It is having someone to help you get the system up and running, if the conditions are affordable I agree to get them up and running.Read more
Azure Queue Storage has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
