Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AODocs and IBM FileNet Content Manager 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BlueDocs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
isoTracker
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Meridian
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$/ User / Year
No pricing available
AODocs
Star Rating
(115)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$/ User / Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansIBM FileNet Content Manager
Star Rating
(139)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM FileNet Content ManagerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM FileNet Content Manager excels in file type support with a score of 9.3, allowing for a wide variety of document formats, while AODocs, although strong, has a slightly lower score in this area, indicating it may not support as many file types.
- Reviewers mention that AODocs shines in ease of setup with a score of 7.6 compared to IBM FileNet's lower score of 5.9, suggesting that AODocs may be more user-friendly for initial implementation.
- G2 users highlight that IBM FileNet Content Manager has superior device management capabilities, scoring 9.4, which allows for better control over devices accessing the system, whereas AODocs, while still strong, scores slightly lower in this aspect.
- Users on G2 report that AODocs offers a more intuitive web interface with a score of 8.8, making navigation easier for everyday users, while IBM FileNet's interface, although functional, does not receive the same level of praise.
- Reviewers say that AODocs provides a better quality of support, scoring 8.4, which is higher than IBM FileNet's score of 7.7, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance with AODocs.
- Users report that both platforms have strong collaboration features, but IBM FileNet Content Manager stands out with a higher score of 8.9 for simultaneously editing documents, which is crucial for teams working on projects together.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AODocs
Enterprise Folders
$
/ User / Year
Use Google Drive as your enterprise file server, with granular folder permissions and easy integration with desktop . applications thanks to the Universal File Opener.
IBM FileNet Content Manager
No pricing availableFree Trial
AODocs
Free Trial is available
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
89
8.3
92
Ease of Use
8.1
89
7.4
92
Ease of Setup
7.6
48
6.0
66
Ease of Admin
8.2
49
7.0
64
Quality of Support
8.4
79
7.8
89
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
49
7.8
66
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
84
7.7
86
Features by Category
Contract Creation & Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Other Platform Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Contract Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Management
9.4
23
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
7.8
23
Not enough data
8.7
20
Not enough data
6.7
11
Not enough data
Workflow
9.0
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
Platform
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AODocs and IBM FileNet Content Manager are categorized as Document Management
Unique Categories
AODocs is categorized as Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
IBM FileNet Content Manager has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AODocs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Accounting
10.1%
Education Management
5.5%
Computer Software
5.5%
Information Technology and Services
4.6%
Primary/Secondary Education
3.7%
Other
70.6%
Insurance
20.2%
Banking
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Government Administration
9.2%
Financial Services
7.3%
Other
34.9%
Discussions
AODocs has no discussions with answers
Does IBM FileNet content Manager support Russian language?
1 Comment
JR
yes, it supports Russian languageRead more
IBM FileNet Content Manager has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
