When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Facebook Live easier to use and administer. However, reviewers felt that Ant Media Server was easier to do business with overall. Finally, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up.
Reviewers felt that Ant Media Server meets the needs of their business better than Facebook Live.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Ant Media Server is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Ant Media Server over Facebook Live.
Ant Media Server can be used in almost any streaming scenario.
Let me share some use cases.
Meeting software
Live event...Read more
How does ant Media work?
1 Comment
EB
Ant Media works very well for our needs. Buffering, streaming, monitoring is convinient and scaling is very easy -at least on Aws. Using Ant Media reduced...Read more
What is a Media Server WebRTC?
1 Comment
HD
A server that provides the functionality required for the proper connection of WebRTC sessions in the cloud or self-hosting in order to make your WebRTC...Read more
If I study, I'll study with you in mind. 🖤🥀Read more
How do I use Facebook live?
1 Comment
AN
Hey There,
Using Facebook live is so simple and easy task. If you using a smartphone, then just download facebook app, if you wants to use facebook live...Read more
What are the best ways to facilitate audience attendance using the native tools?
1 Comment
KF
Facebook live is one of the best features that offers audiovisual capabilities that makes it easy and convincing to disseminate ideologies. One requires to...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.