When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Ant Media Server easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers felt that Dacast is easier to set up. Both products were equally easy to administer.
Reviewers felt that Ant Media Server meets the needs of their business better than Dacast.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Ant Media Server is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Ant Media Server over Dacast.
Ant Media Server can be used in almost any streaming scenario.
Let me share some use cases.
Meeting software
Live event...Read more
How does ant Media work?
1 Comment
EB
Ant Media works very well for our needs. Buffering, streaming, monitoring is convinient and scaling is very easy -at least on Aws. Using Ant Media reduced...Read more
What is a Media Server WebRTC?
1 Comment
HD
A server that provides the functionality required for the proper connection of WebRTC sessions in the cloud or self-hosting in order to make your WebRTC...Read more
Hi David, Thank you for your message. We would love to help you with your project! I invite you to test for free our platform so you can experiment with how...Read more
What is the function of broadcast software?
1 Comment
SR
User end broadcast software is software that takes a video signal from a camera or other input device and encodes it into a stream sent over the internet to...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.