Users report that Anova Consulting Group excels in "Responsiveness" with a score of 9.8, while Goldpan achieves a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Goldpan may provide quicker support and communication during projects.
Reviewers mention that Anova's "Execution Ability" scored 9.4, which is lower than Goldpan's perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that Goldpan may have a more effective approach to executing project plans and strategies.
G2 users highlight that Anova's "Met Deadlines" score is 9.7, while Goldpan boasts a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Goldpan may have a stronger track record of delivering projects on time.
Users on G2 report that Anova's "Scope Management" scored 9.4, compared to Goldpan's perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that Goldpan may be more adept at managing project scope changes effectively.
Reviewers say that Anova's "Vertical Expertise" scored 8.6, while Goldpan received a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Goldpan may have a deeper understanding of specific industry needs and challenges.
Users mention that Anova's "Change Management Skills" scored 8.9, which may indicate room for improvement compared to Goldpan, which has not been rated in this area but has higher scores in related categories, suggesting a more robust overall approach to managing change.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Anova Consulting Group
No pricing available
Goldpan
No pricing available
Free Trial
Anova Consulting Group
No trial information available
Goldpan
No trial information available
Ratings
Quality of Work
9.6
90
9.8
20
Responsiveness
9.8
90
10.0
20
Expertise of Team
9.6
90
9.9
20
Execution Ability
9.4
90
10.0
20
Communication Skills
9.7
88
9.9
20
Professionalism
9.9
91
10.0
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.