Users report that Angular Material excels in its comprehensive Component Library, scoring 8.8, which includes a wide range of pre-built UI components that are highly customizable, making it easier for developers to create responsive applications.
Reviewers mention that NGX-Bootstrap, while having a solid Language Contingency score of 9.0, sometimes lacks the depth of components found in Angular Material, with a lower score of 7.5 in its Component Library, which can limit flexibility in design.
G2 users highlight that Angular Material's Product Direction is rated at 9.7, indicating strong ongoing development and support for new features, which is crucial for businesses looking for long-term viability.
Users on G2 report that NGX-Bootstrap has a slightly better Ease of Use score of 9.2 compared to Angular Material's 8.7, suggesting that it may be more approachable for new developers or those unfamiliar with Angular.
Reviewers say that Angular Material's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.8, which is beneficial for teams looking to quickly implement a robust UI framework, while NGX-Bootstrap does not have a score listed, indicating potential challenges in this area.
Users report that both products have comparable Quality of Support, with Angular Material at 8.4 and NGX-Bootstrap at 8.3, suggesting that users can expect reliable assistance from both frameworks when needed.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Angular Material
No pricing available
NGX-Bootstrap
No pricing available
Free Trial
Angular Material
No trial information available
NGX-Bootstrap
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
39
8.7
10
Ease of Use
8.7
40
9.2
10
Ease of Setup
8.8
17
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
37
8.3
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.