Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amplitude Feature Experimentation and Chameleon Software 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Product Fruits
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Amplitude Feature Experimentation
Star Rating
(24)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amplitude Feature ExperimentationChameleon
Star Rating
(323)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (58.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say Chameleon excels in ease of use with a score of 8.1, while users report that Amplitude Feature Experimentation struggles in this area, leading to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users mention that Chameleon offers a free trial, making it accessible for businesses to test before committing, whereas Amplitude Feature Experimentation does not provide a similar entry-level pricing option.
- G2 users highlight Chameleon's quality of support with a score of 9.0, noting that the support team is responsive and helpful, while reviewers mention that Amplitude Feature Experimentation's support could be improved, impacting user satisfaction.
- Users on G2 report that Chameleon has a strong product direction with an 8.9 score, indicating a commitment to continuous improvement, while Amplitude Feature Experimentation lacks clarity in its future roadmap, leading to uncertainty among users.
- Reviewers mention that Chameleon has a higher total number of reviews (281) compared to Amplitude Feature Experimentation (12), suggesting a more established user base and more comprehensive feedback on its features.
- Users say that Chameleon's ease of setup is rated at 8.2, with many praising its intuitive interface, while Amplitude Feature Experimentation's setup process is often described as cumbersome, which can delay implementation for teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amplitude Feature Experimentation
No pricing availableChameleon
Demos Free
Free
Create unlimited Interactive Demos with Chameleon.
- Chapters, CTAs, email capture
- On-brand design
- Engagement tracking
Free Trial
Amplitude Feature Experimentation
No trial information availableChameleon
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
13
8.4
291
Ease of Use
7.1
14
8.2
297
Ease of Setup
7.1
8
8.2
175
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.5
140
Quality of Support
7.4
11
9.0
255
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.2
134
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
14
8.9
286
Features by Category
User Analysis
Not enough data
8.4
149
Not enough data
7.0
151
User Support
Not enough data
7.9
162
Not enough data
6.7
111
Not enough data
7.7
142
Walkthrough Type
Not enough data
7.9
136
Not enough data
8.6
158
Platform Basics - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
7.9
19
Analytics - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
7.3
19
Functions - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
7.1
18
Not enough data
7.6
19
Agentic AI - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
7.1
11
Segmentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Targeting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Triggered Content
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalized Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Personalization Engines
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
Computing
8.0
10
Not enough data
6.1
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Experimental Design
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
12
Not enough data
6.5
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - A/B Testing
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Prospect Engagement
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Demo Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.0
9
Agentic AI - Demo Automation
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.1
7
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.2
84
Self-Service Experience
Not enough data
8.3
123
Not enough data
8.3
121
Not enough data
6.8
102
Not enough data
6.5
99
Not enough data
8.5
120
Self-Service Platform
Not enough data
8.6
125
Not enough data
7.9
109
Not enough data
6.8
97
Not enough data
8.3
118
Agentic AI - Customer Self-Service
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Agentic AI - Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Variation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amplitude Feature Experimentation and Chameleon are categorized as Personalization
Unique Categories
Amplitude Feature Experimentation is categorized as A/B Testing, Personalization Engines, Feature Management, and Mobile App Optimization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amplitude Feature Experimentation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Chameleon
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.8%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Retail
4.5%
Real Estate
4.5%
Other
40.9%
Computer Software
34.8%
Information Technology and Services
14.9%
Financial Services
5.4%
Marketing and Advertising
4.7%
Computer & Network Security
2.2%
Other
38.0%
Discussions
Amplitude Feature Experimentation has no discussions with answers
Is it possible to create templates when you are using the different screens, as different User may have different preferences.
1 Comment
PA
Yes, you can create templates that you can re-use when creating Tour Steps. That allows you to set different styles or basic configurations to enable you to...Read more
What is the best way to create survey with up more that 3 questions
1 Comment
JB
Surveys are conducted to know people's opinions by asking some questions. Most well-known companies in the united states, Canada, the UK, Mexico, and other...Read more
Chameleon has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
