Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amp and Claude 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Roboflow
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (68.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
Amp
Star Rating
(90)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00 1 User Per Year
Learn more about AmpClaude
Star Rating
(68)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ClaudeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Claude excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.3, making it a favorite among small businesses looking for straightforward implementation, while Sourcegraph Cody, with a score of 8.9, is noted for being slightly more complex to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that Claude's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.5, which some users find lacking compared to Sourcegraph Cody's higher score of 8.4, indicating a more responsive support system for troubleshooting and assistance.
- G2 users highlight that Claude's "Performance" in "Response Generation Speed" is impressive, but Sourcegraph Cody shines in "Contextual Understanding," where it has a better ability to maintain conversation flow, making it more effective for complex queries.
- Users on G2 report that Claude's "Customizability" is rated at 8.3, allowing for tailored solutions, while Sourcegraph Cody's flexibility in "API User-Friendliness" is rated higher, making it easier for developers to integrate into existing systems.
- Reviewers mention that Claude's "Data Security" and "Reliability" both score 8.5, which is commendable, but Sourcegraph Cody's overall "Update Frequency and Utility" score of 8.8 suggests it may offer more regular enhancements and features over time.
- Users say that while both products have strong "Functionality," Claude's "Accuracy" is rated at 7.7, which some users find less reliable compared to Sourcegraph Cody's performance in "Input Processing" with a score of 8.0, indicating better handling of diverse data inputs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amp
Enterprise
$59.00
1 User Per Year
AI & search with enterprise-level security, scalability, and flexibility
- Dedicated Cloud or Self-Hosted deployment
- Unlimited autocomplete and chat messages
- LLM Support & Flexible LLM choices including: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro and Flash Bring your own LLM key.
Claude
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amp
Free Trial is available
Claude
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
87
8.4
62
Ease of Use
8.6
87
9.0
63
Ease of Setup
8.9
82
9.0
34
Ease of Admin
8.2
10
9.2
12
Quality of Support
8.2
60
7.3
37
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
8
9.3
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
87
8.9
61
Features by Category
Core Conversational Capabilities - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
8.2
47
Interaction
Not enough data
8.3
48
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
8.7
48
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
8.0
44
Task & Flow Management - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Learning
Not enough data
8.4
48
Not enough data
7.4
45
Deployment & Embedding - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Generation
Not enough data
8.8
46
Not enough data
8.3
46
Admin & Configuration - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
8.0
40
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.2
42
Not enough data
7.9
40
Agentic AI - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring & Improvement - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reliability & Safety - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Algorithm
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Translation Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Offering Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Machine Translation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Recognition Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Facial Recognition
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Labeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
7.6
67
9.2
6
8.1
67
9.4
6
8.3
66
9.4
6
8.0
66
8.9
6
Support
7.6
64
7.2
6
7.8
64
8.1
6
7.5
64
7.5
6
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Coding Assistants
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
Usability - AI Coding Assistants
7.7
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amp and Claude are categorized as AI Code Generation
Unique Categories
Amp is categorized as AI Coding Assistants
Claude is categorized as AI Chatbots, Natural Language Understanding (NLU), Image Recognition, and Machine Translation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amp
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Claude
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
34.8%
Information Technology and Services
15.7%
Program Development
3.4%
Financial Services
3.4%
Marketing and Advertising
2.2%
Other
40.4%
Marketing and Advertising
15.2%
Information Technology and Services
13.6%
Computer Software
12.1%
Consulting
4.5%
Writing and Editing
4.5%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
Amp has no discussions with answers
Claude has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
